2020
DOI: 10.1007/s00520-020-05607-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness randomized clinical trial on the effect of photobiomodulation therapy for prevention of radiotherapy-induced severe oral mucositis in a Brazilian cancer hospital setting

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In countries where PBM therapy is widely used, the current literature suggests a financial advantage of using it to prevent OM 119 . This cost‐effectiveness analysis may not apply universally.…”
Section: Mucositis and Health Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In countries where PBM therapy is widely used, the current literature suggests a financial advantage of using it to prevent OM 119 . This cost‐effectiveness analysis may not apply universally.…”
Section: Mucositis and Health Economicsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The PBM is recommended for the prevention and treatment of OM in patients receiving cancer treatments. Several studies have demonstrated the effectiveness of anti-inflammatory effects in supporting tissue repair [ 13 , 33 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 ]. Nevertheless, clinical evidence still shows that some patients present recurring episodes of OM during their cancer therapy despite being treated with LLLT [ 37 ].…”
Section: Prevention and Management Strategiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the intervention groups, seven types of nonpharmacological interventions were identified. Specifically, two studies used oral wetting and cleaning agents (Lambrecht et al., 2013; Wong et al., 2017); 10 studies conducted honey treatment (Alvi et al., 2013; Amanat et al., 2017; Bardy et al., 2012; Biswal et al., 2003; Charalambous et al., 2018; Hawley et al., 2014; Jayalekshmi et al., 2016; Maiti et al., 2012; Motallebnejad et al., 2008; Rashad et al., 2009); 10 studies provided low‐level laser therapy (Antunes et al., 2013; Gautam et al., 2012; Gouvêa de Lima et al., 2012; Kauark‐Fontes et al., 2022; Kuhn et al., 2008; Legouté et al., 2019; Lopes Martins et al., 2021; Marín‐Conde et al., 2019; Nugent et al., 2022; Oton‐Leite et al., 2015); seven studies treated patients with natural plant‐based therapies, including natural plant extract mouthwashes (Aghamohammadi et al., 2018; Arantes et al., 2021; Kong et al., 2016; You et al., 2009), and natural plant extract capsules (Arun et al., 2020; Delavarian et al., 2019; Soni et al., 2022); 13 studies provided participants with nutritional supplements (Bakr et al., 2021; Büntzel et al., 2010; Chattopadhyay et al., 2014; Dastan et al., 2020; Demir Doğan et al., 2017; Ertekin et al., 2004; Fernandes et al., 2022; Hamstra et al., 2018; Huang et al., 2019; Lozano et al., 2021; Onseng et al., 2017; Sangthawan et al., 2013; Tsujimoto et al., 2015); six studies used microecological preparations (De Sanctis et al., 2019; Jiang et al., 2019; Manifar et al., 2022; Mirza et al., 2022; Sharma et al., 2012; Xia et al., 2021); and the rem...…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%