Cost-effectiveness of water quality interventions for preventing diarrhoeal disease in developing countries

Abstract

Using effectiveness data from a recent systematic review and cost data from programme implementers and World Health Organization (WHO) databases, we conducted a costeffectiveness analysis to compare non-piped in source-(dug well, borehole and communal stand post) and four types of household-(chlorination, filtration, solar disinfection, flocculation/disinfection) based interventions to improve the microbial quality of water for preventing diarrhoeal disease. Results are reported for two WHO epidemiological sub-regions, Afr-E (sub-Saharan African countries with very high adult and child mortality) and Sear-D (South East Asian countries with high adult and child mortality) at 50% intervention coverage. Measured against international benchmarks, source-and household-based interventions were generally cost effective or highly cost effective even before the estimated saving in health costs that would offset the cost of implementation. Household-based chlorination was the most cost-effective where resources are limited; household filtration yields additional health gains at higher budget levels. Flocculation/disinfection was strongly dominated by all other interventions; solar disinfection was weakly dominated by chlorination. In addition to cost-effectiveness, choices among water quality interventions must be guided by local conditions, user preferences, potential for cost recovery from beneficiaries and other factors.

Factors association with some bacteria cause diarrhea disease among children under 5 years old

“…Findings from our study indicate that patient <5 years of age were more likely to have diarrhea than those who were younger. This is similar to previous reports from other study [29] [30]. "Protection against diarrhea in the youngest age group may be conferred by several mechanisms such as maternal antibodies against enteric pathogens and current breast feeding.…”

Marketing Household Water Treatment: Willingness to Pay Results from an Experiment in Rural Kenya

“…Household water treatment has been found to significantly reduce diarrheal disease and may be more effective than interventions to improve water quality at the source [3]. Despite growing availability of household water treatment products, demand remains low.…”

Using Limes and Synthetic Psoralens to Enhance Solar Disinfection of Water (SODIS): A Laboratory Evaluation with Norovirus, Escherichia coli, and MS2

“…2 In low-income regions without access to adequately treated piped water, household water treatment (HWT) has been one of the most cost-effective ways to reduce the incidence of waterborne illness. 3,4 Solar disinfection of water (SODIS) is one of several HWT methods that effectively reduce the incidence of diarrheal illness and is recommended by the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF) as a HWT method. 5 The SODIS protocol, as it is most widely publicized, calls for 1-2 L polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottles to be exposed to sunlight for 6 hours.…”