2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2020.05.065
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost effectiveness of trivalent and quadrivalent influenza vaccines in 50- to 64-year-old adults in Korea

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Age 50–64 years: In seven of the eight studies identified that specifically analyzed this age group [ 138 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 ], IV was cost-effective for outpatient or hospitalized ILI events, pneumonia, and death. Four of the studies included CV outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Age 50–64 years: In seven of the eight studies identified that specifically analyzed this age group [ 138 146 147 148 149 150 151 152 ], IV was cost-effective for outpatient or hospitalized ILI events, pneumonia, and death. Four of the studies included CV outcomes.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value was also comparable with another study conducted in Spain whereby QALY lost in the elderly aged 65 years and above was at 0.0061 47 . The application of disutility value from UK and other high-income countries was also utilized by the Korean and Thailand studies 21 , 48 . Nevertheless, the multiple-one-way sensitivity analysis also demonstrated this parameter had limited impact on the ICER result.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Across the Asia–Pacific region, several cost-effectiveness studies have been conducted in the use of influenza vaccine in the elderly 18 20 . For instance, a Korean study reported that the inclusion of influenza vaccines in the National Immunization Program (NIP) for those aged 50–64 years was cost effective, with QIVs emerging as the preferred option based on its greater protection against influenza B 21 . To the best of our knowledge, no cost-effectiveness analysis of the influenza vaccine has been performed in Malaysia.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…16 Vaccination of the 50–64 age-group has been found to be cost effective. 25–28 Evidence suggests that the expantion of the influenza vaccination program beyond the targeted population may constitute an alternative strategy to reduce the burden of influenza, resulting in an overall higher vaccination uptake and in an easier implementation than a risk-based recommendation. 21 , 24 , 29 However, in Italy, vaccination coverage in the 2019–2020 season was only 54.6% among subjects over 65 years of age, 16.8% in the general population and even lower (9.6%) among those aged 45–64 years.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%