2015
DOI: 10.3109/10428194.2014.982635
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of the sequential application of tyrosine kinase inhibitors for the treatment of chronic myeloid leukemia

Abstract: Several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are approved for chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) therapy. We evaluated the long-term cost-effectiveness of seven sequential therapy regimens for CML in Austria. A cost-effectiveness analysis was performed using a state-transition Markov model. As model parameters, we used published trial data, clinical, epidemiological and economic data from the Austrian CML registry and national databases. We performed a cohort simulation over a life-long time-horizon from a societal p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
21
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 52 publications
1
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using first-line nilotinib resulted in an incremental cost:utility ratio of V121 400/QALY. 24 If generic imatinib is considered instead of the brand name version, and considering a price for the generic version that is 52% that of the brand name version, the difference is V402 500/QALY relative to the next effective strategy not using imatinib as first-line therapy (nilotinib followed by dasatinib followed by SCT), and V656 400 if the price of generic imatinib is 10% of the current price for the brand name version. In a similar analysis from the United Kingdom, imatinib followed by nilotinib was found to be the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost:utility ratio of £192 000/QALY.…”
Section: Cost-effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using first-line nilotinib resulted in an incremental cost:utility ratio of V121 400/QALY. 24 If generic imatinib is considered instead of the brand name version, and considering a price for the generic version that is 52% that of the brand name version, the difference is V402 500/QALY relative to the next effective strategy not using imatinib as first-line therapy (nilotinib followed by dasatinib followed by SCT), and V656 400 if the price of generic imatinib is 10% of the current price for the brand name version. In a similar analysis from the United Kingdom, imatinib followed by nilotinib was found to be the most cost-effective strategy with an incremental cost:utility ratio of £192 000/QALY.…”
Section: Cost-effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EUthyroid has developed a decision-analytic model [15] to evaluate the long-term effectiveness and cost effectiveness of IDD prevention programmes. All relevant health conditions and events potentially caused by iodine deficiency or affected by related prevention programmes are included.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More than 10 national and international scientific, and 30 national and international company partners are joined in 20 Oncotyrol -Center for Personalized Cancer Medicine 5 …”
Section: Partners Of the Consortiummentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Additionally, economic parameters and resource use data for the Austrian health care setting were collected and entered into the model to conduct a cost-effectiveness analysis. [20] In the absence of an Austrian willingness-to pay threshold, two strategies were considered potentially cost-effective among those including a second-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor: imatinib followed by second-line nilotinib (131,100 D /QALY) and nilotinib followed by second-line dasatinib following nilotinib failure (152,400 D /QALY). [20] Additionally, the model was applied to the U.S. health care context.…”
Section: Effectiveness and Cost Effectiveness Of Sequential Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%