2023
DOI: 10.1080/21645515.2023.2168952
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) against herpes zoster: An updated critical review

Abstract: The objective of this study was to critically review the cost-effectiveness (CE) of the recombinant zoster vaccine (RZV) against herpes zoster (HZ). A literature review was conducted in PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane between January 1, 2017, and February 28, 2022, and on select public healthcare agency websites to identify and collect data from CE studies comparing RZV to zoster vaccine live (ZVL) or to no vaccination. Study characteristics, inputs, and outputs were collected. The overall CE of RZV was assessed.… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 55 publications
(238 reference statements)
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A 2022 meta-analysis of 12 studies (from the US, Asia, Canada, and Europe) that compared RZV versus no HZ vaccination concluded that RZV was cost effective for people aged 60–79 years from a societal perspective, and for those aged 60–69 years from a third-party payer perspective [ 49 ]. A 2023 review of 18 studies (from the US, Europe, Asia, and Canada) reported that RZV vaccination was predicted to be cost effective in 15 of the 18 included studies [ 50 ]. A 2022 systematic review of seven US studies concluded that RZV was a cost-effective strategy but that second-dose compliance is important [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A 2022 meta-analysis of 12 studies (from the US, Asia, Canada, and Europe) that compared RZV versus no HZ vaccination concluded that RZV was cost effective for people aged 60–79 years from a societal perspective, and for those aged 60–69 years from a third-party payer perspective [ 49 ]. A 2023 review of 18 studies (from the US, Europe, Asia, and Canada) reported that RZV vaccination was predicted to be cost effective in 15 of the 18 included studies [ 50 ]. A 2022 systematic review of seven US studies concluded that RZV was a cost-effective strategy but that second-dose compliance is important [ 51 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Practical applications of the present work can be foreseen in health economics and outcomes research. The cost benefits of vaccination interventions against herpes zoster have been reviewed extensively [ 40 44 ] and QALY losses have been identified as significant sources of outcome variability in cost-effectiveness analyses. While differentiation of QALY losses per episode of herpes zoster between vaccinated and unvaccinated cohorts has been performed for ZVL [ 45 ], based on primary pain and QoL outcomes reported elsewhere [ 1 , 11 , 46 ], the equivalent analysis for RZV was until now missing.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The costs of treating a developed disease with the cythopatic effect (illustrated by Tzank test) are much higher here, with reduced effectiveness. However, there is no vaccine against HSV, the efficacy of VZV immunization is not tested in a reproducible manner, and the effectiveness criteria vary [ 23 ]. The disease is diagnosed arbitrarily, and protection is assumed without laboratory analysis.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%