2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2017.07.014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness of Take-Home Naloxone for the Prevention of Overdose Fatalities among Heroin Users in the United Kingdom

Abstract: Our evaluation suggests that the distribution of take-home naloxone decreased overdose deaths by around 6.6% and was cost-effective with an incremental cost per QALY gained well below a £20,000 willingness-to-pay threshold set by UK decision-makers. The model code has been made available to aid future research. Further study is warranted on the impact of different formulations of naloxone on cost-effectiveness and the impact take-home naloxone has on the wider society.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
56
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
(58 reference statements)
1
56
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The current treatment of fentanyl overdose is naloxone, an opioid antagonist. Distribution of naloxone to high-risk populations is being expanded in the United States and has been shown to be a cost-effective strategy for decreasing overdose deaths in both the United States and UK (Wheeler et al, 2015;Langham et al, 2018). However, for naloxone to be effective, administration is required shortly after exposure and with proper technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The current treatment of fentanyl overdose is naloxone, an opioid antagonist. Distribution of naloxone to high-risk populations is being expanded in the United States and has been shown to be a cost-effective strategy for decreasing overdose deaths in both the United States and UK (Wheeler et al, 2015;Langham et al, 2018). However, for naloxone to be effective, administration is required shortly after exposure and with proper technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Programmes are supported by World Health Organization guidelines [12] and endorsed by the United Nations [13]. Evidence suggests that providing people who use opioids with overdose training increases their knowledge of overdose risk factors, signs and responses [14][15][16][17][18][19], that people who use opioids can and will use naloxone to reverse overdoses when trained [18,[20][21][22] and that naloxone distribution to people who use opioids reduces mortality [23,24] and is cost-effective [25,26]. Despite this, most countries do not have naloxone programmes and countries that do have differing policies, training and provision that can be constrained by national and local legal and regulatory frameworks, as well as costs [27,28].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several agencies recommend expanding access to naloxone, including the US Department of Health and Human Services, the Surgeon General, the World Health Organization, the American Medical Association, the American Public Health Association, and the National Association of Boards of Pharmacy (30)(31)(32)(33)(34)(35). OEND programs have been shown to effectively train bystanders how to recognize an overdose and administer naloxone, reduce the number of fatal overdoses, and encourage recipients to reduce opioid use and enter treatment (36)(37)(38)(39)(40)(41)(42)(43). Several programs have been implemented in EMS systems across the country (44)(45)(46)(47).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%