1999
DOI: 10.1046/j.1524-4733.1999.24003.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness of Prolonged Administration of a Low Molecular Weight Heparin for the Prevention of Deep Venous Thrombosis Following Total Hip Replacement

Abstract: Recently there has been discussion on the value of prolonged thromboprophylaxis after elective hip surgery to prevent thromboembolic complications up to one month. Continuing low molecular weight heparin for one month can significantly reduce the frequency of venographically-proven deep vein thrombosis (DVT). How this will influence health economics has hitherto not been evaluated. Data on costs and effect from a randomized comparison between 10 and 30 days of once daily low molecular weight heparin (enoxapari… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
5

Year Published

2000
2000
2011
2011

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
20
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…This benefit was observed without any increase in bleeding complications. There is also good evidence, including health economic benefits, for extending thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery patients undergoing THA [5,10,[18][19][20]. Bleeding was not measured in this study, partly due to methodological limitations in coding for bleeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This benefit was observed without any increase in bleeding complications. There is also good evidence, including health economic benefits, for extending thromboprophylaxis in orthopedic surgery patients undergoing THA [5,10,[18][19][20]. Bleeding was not measured in this study, partly due to methodological limitations in coding for bleeding.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Such papers seek to estimate costs, but are not based on real-practice costs or outcomes following VTE prophylaxis. LMWH also provides a clinical and economic alternative for high-risk patients who have suffered trauma or are at risk of VTE because of major orthopedic surgery [22][23][24][25][26][27]. Swedish studies of orthopedic surgery patients show that when costs of VTE prophylaxis with LMWH or UFH are considered, against the costs involved in surveillance testing and treatment for post-operative DVT, LMWH is cost effective for up to 30 days following surgery [24,25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1). Extended prophylaxis appears to be economically viable [78,79], and recent studies show fondaparinux to be more cost effective than enoxaparin [26,67,80]. To our knowledge, no studies show the cost effectiveness of aspirin.…”
Section: Duration Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 95%