2016
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2016.16286
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of PCSK9 Inhibitor Therapy

Abstract: HIV/AIDS, West Nile virus, and C difficile occurred over this period. Mortality due to vaccine-preventable diseases declined, whereas mortality due to pathogens with resistant strains remained stable.The study is limited to US mortality reported on death certificates, only partly capturing the true burden of these diseases. Globally, infectious diseases were the second (lower respiratory infections), fourth (diarrheal diseases) and fifth (HIV/ AIDS) leading causes of lost disability-adjusted life-years. 5 Gr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
(4 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The high retail cost of PCSK9i therapy has led to significant debate about their cost-effectiveness and optimal price points . In response to these costs, payors have implemented various utilization management strategies including prior authorization requirements and patient cost-sharing (copays).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The high retail cost of PCSK9i therapy has led to significant debate about their cost-effectiveness and optimal price points . In response to these costs, payors have implemented various utilization management strategies including prior authorization requirements and patient cost-sharing (copays).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…The high retail cost of PCSK9i therapy has led to significant debate about their cost-effectiveness and optimal price points. [3][4][5] In response to these costs, payors have implemented various utilization management strategies including prior authorization requirements and patient cost-sharing (copays). While these strategies have contained costs, 6 our analysis suggests that these practices may be a blunt instrument to identify those at highest risk or those who may benefit the most.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%