2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2018.06.104
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of optimized adherence to prevention guidelines in European patients with coronary heart disease: Results from the EUROASPIRE IV survey

Abstract: Depending on the method used better or worse ICERs were found. In addition, optimized guidelines adherence is more cost-effective in higher risk patients, in patients with higher risk reductions and when using a less strict LDL-C target. Current analyses advice to maximize guidelines adherence in particular patient subgroups.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
6
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
1
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…A study assessing the cost-effectiveness of the ESC/EAS guidelines in patients with a history of CVD from EUROASPIRE IV, showed variations among estimated costs of statins and ezetimibe across different countries. In Czech Republic, the estimated costs for simvastatin were €0.04-0.29, which was relatively cheaper compared with Ukraine (€0.21-0.42) [26]. It is also noteworthy that following the expiry of the ezetimibe patent in 2017, cheaper generic versions have since become available in the EU.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A study assessing the cost-effectiveness of the ESC/EAS guidelines in patients with a history of CVD from EUROASPIRE IV, showed variations among estimated costs of statins and ezetimibe across different countries. In Czech Republic, the estimated costs for simvastatin were €0.04-0.29, which was relatively cheaper compared with Ukraine (€0.21-0.42) [26]. It is also noteworthy that following the expiry of the ezetimibe patent in 2017, cheaper generic versions have since become available in the EU.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite of the guidelines on CVD prevention developed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC), two large-scale cross-sectional surveys in European countries revealed that a large proportion of patients with CHD received suboptimal management for CVD risk factors ( Kotseva et al, 2009 ; Kotseva et al, 2016 ; Piepoli et al, 2016 ). Optimizing the management of CVD risk factors in these patients, such as using statins to achieve the LDL-C goals and smoking cessation, was found to be cost-effective ( De Smedt et al, 2012 ; De Smedt et al, 2018 ). Our study also suggested that the CVD risk management at a national level can lead to decrease in the costs of CVD.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Considering high-risk patients (≥20%), the ICER was reduced to 29,093€/QALY with decreasing ICERs in higherrisk patients. Patients with higher-risk reductions (≥0.5%) were also associated with lower ICERs [59]. Another study evaluating the cost-effectiveness of enhancing adherence to antihypertension medications indicated that enhancing adherence from 52% (the baseline) to 70% and 80% resulted in a reduced ICER from €76,484 (95% CI €74,807-€78,152) to €75,055 (95% CI €73,490-€76,623) and €73,605 (95% CI €72,180-€75,157), respectively, for each hospitalization for a MACE prevented.…”
Section: Economic Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 95%