2000
DOI: 10.1001/archinte.160.18.2773
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of New Antiplatelet Regimens Used as Secondary Prevention of Stroke or Transient Ischemic Attack

Abstract: To prevent stroke in high-risk patients, dipyridamole combined with aspirin was more effective and less costly than aspirin alone, and clopidogrel was cost-effective compared with current standards of medical practice, except in extreme scenarios.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
22
0
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 62 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 32 publications
1
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…This figure, however, would appear to be cost effective when considering that reported costs per QALY for clopidogrel treatment in stroke prevention approach £17 000. 16 Furthermore, costs per QALY after lumbar discectomy have been reported to be as high as £22 000. 17 Acute costs for treatment have only been considered here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This figure, however, would appear to be cost effective when considering that reported costs per QALY for clopidogrel treatment in stroke prevention approach £17 000. 16 Furthermore, costs per QALY after lumbar discectomy have been reported to be as high as £22 000. 17 Acute costs for treatment have only been considered here.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The fourth study was based on patients with prior TIA or nondisabling ischemic stroke. 35 The latter study was included because patients with prior TIA or stroke are at higher risk for coronary heart disease. Coronary heart disease was considered as an outcome in all these studies.…”
Section: Aspirin Doses In Established Cadmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…283,284 However, even small reductions in vascular events compared with aspirin may make combination dipyridamole and aspirin or clopidogrel costeffective from a broader societal perspective. 285 For patients intolerant to aspirin because of allergy or gastrointestinal side effects, clopidogrel is an appropriate choice. Dipyridamole is not tolerated by some patients because of persistent headache.…”
Section: Selection Of Oral Antiplatelet Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%