1997
DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199712020-00014
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost Effectiveness of Micronised Fenofibrate and Simvastatin in the Short Term Treatment of Type IIa and Type IIb Hyperlipidaemia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also, these studies were based on estimates of benefit from changes in lipid profiles and not data from mortality trials with fenofibrate, since the latter do not exist. Kirchgassler et al 160 used data from two randomized controlled trials 67,129 (Table 2) in retrospective fashion to compare the cost-effectiveness of simulated 12-week courses of micronized fenofibrate 200 mg/d (n = 88) and simvastatin 20 mg/d (n = 85) in the treatment of types IIa and IIb hyperlipidemia. Successful treatment was defined as a 15% decrease in LDL-C (type IIa) and a 15% decrease in LDL-C plus a 30% decrease in TG (type IIb).…”
Section: Micronized Fenofibratementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Also, these studies were based on estimates of benefit from changes in lipid profiles and not data from mortality trials with fenofibrate, since the latter do not exist. Kirchgassler et al 160 used data from two randomized controlled trials 67,129 (Table 2) in retrospective fashion to compare the cost-effectiveness of simulated 12-week courses of micronized fenofibrate 200 mg/d (n = 88) and simvastatin 20 mg/d (n = 85) in the treatment of types IIa and IIb hyperlipidemia. Successful treatment was defined as a 15% decrease in LDL-C (type IIa) and a 15% decrease in LDL-C plus a 30% decrease in TG (type IIb).…”
Section: Micronized Fenofibratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…These results were confirmed by sensitivity analysis. 160 Perreault et al 161 conducted a study of the lifetime costeffectiveness of HMG-CoA reductase inhibitors and fibrates in hyperlipidemia management. Analyses were conducted using middle-aged men and women who had no history of CAD with either primary type IIa or IIb hyperlipidemia.…”
Section: Micronized Fenofibratementioning
confidence: 99%
“…24) Another study, in which fenoˆbrate (200 mg/day) and simvastatin (20 mg/day) were compared in type IIb hyperlipidemia treatment, fenoˆbrate was reported to be more cost eŠective. 25) When fenoˆbrate, bezabrate, gemˆbrozil, ‰uvastatin, lovastatin and simvastatin were compared in type IIa and type IIb hyperlipidemia patient groups, simvastatin was the most cost eŠective in the combined patient group (types IIa and IIb), but in the type IIb patient group, fenoˆbrate was more cost eŠective than simvastatin. 14) Our results are in agreement with the results of these studies and suggest that medical costs could be reduced by prescribing fenoˆbrate to patients with type IIb or type IV hyperlipidemia.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%