2000
DOI: 10.1017/s026646230010203x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COST-EFFECTIVENESS OF INTERFERON BETA-1B IN SLOWING MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS DISABILITY PROGRESSION First Estimates

Abstract: Using the Expanded Disability Status Scale, cost per disability year avoided due to interferon beta-1b treatment in RRMS is quite high. Comparable CE estimates, using MS-specific or generic health-related quality-of-life outcome measures, are even higher. Further research is required to better measure treatment effects, modification of MS natural history, and net societal costs of IFN beta-1b in RRMS.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Existing analyses have produced a range of cost-effectiveness estimates from in excess of £1 million per QALY gained to cost saving. [30][31][32] Significant flaws in the modelling of natural history, efficacy, discontinuation of therapy, mortality and the treatment of uncertainty mean that none of these estimates can be considered robust. 33 In general, those models which produced very high cost-effectiveness estimates tended to have shorter time horizons (less than 10 years) or assumed that all benefit ceased when the patient stopped therapy.…”
Section: Economic Evaluations Of Disease Modifying Treatments For Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Existing analyses have produced a range of cost-effectiveness estimates from in excess of £1 million per QALY gained to cost saving. [30][31][32] Significant flaws in the modelling of natural history, efficacy, discontinuation of therapy, mortality and the treatment of uncertainty mean that none of these estimates can be considered robust. 33 In general, those models which produced very high cost-effectiveness estimates tended to have shorter time horizons (less than 10 years) or assumed that all benefit ceased when the patient stopped therapy.…”
Section: Economic Evaluations Of Disease Modifying Treatments For Msmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because these medications offer only partial control of the disease, researchers have conducted studies to demonstrate the utility of some of these treatments in clinical practice using cost effectiveness analyses [7][8][9]. The significant expense, partial efficacy, side effects, and requirement for self-injection of these medications have made their effectiveness in clinical practice difficult for researchers to determine.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the study did not consider work absenteeism, lost productivity and patient dependence on care, or the long-term costs of care. 72 Another model analyzing costs for patients with RRMS that considered long-term savings found that treatment with SC IFNβ-1a was cost-effective 73 : treatment with IFNβ-1a in the United Kingdom was estimated to cost £453 per month over 10 years and £222 per month of disability prevented over 20 years. Data were not reported for other DMTs.…”
Section: Cost-utility and Cost-effectiveness Analyses Of Dmtsmentioning
confidence: 99%