2005
DOI: 10.1001/archpsyc.62.12.1313
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of Improving Primary Care Treatment of Late-Life Depression

Abstract: The IMPACT intervention is a high-value investment for older adults; it is associated with high clinical benefits at a low increment in health care costs.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

10
174
1
4

Year Published

2007
2007
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 208 publications
(194 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
10
174
1
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Raw scores from the depressionspecific measure were linearly interpolated to reflect utilities between 0.51 and 1.0. However, the utilities that Lave et al (1998) and Katon et al (2005) averaged were not all elicited from patients with depression. Utilities derived from patients (vs. providers or nonpatients) are preferred (Hlatk, 1995;Montgomery and Fahey, 2001).…”
Section: Estimating Health Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Raw scores from the depressionspecific measure were linearly interpolated to reflect utilities between 0.51 and 1.0. However, the utilities that Lave et al (1998) and Katon et al (2005) averaged were not all elicited from patients with depression. Utilities derived from patients (vs. providers or nonpatients) are preferred (Hlatk, 1995;Montgomery and Fahey, 2001).…”
Section: Estimating Health Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Because administering the SG is not always feasible, researchers have relied on previously published utilities. For example, Lave et al (1998) and Katon et al (2005) used the average of six published depression-related utilities scores. Participants considered depressed (via the researchers' depression outcome) were assigned a utility of 0.51 and participants considered not depressed were assigned a utility of 1.…”
Section: Estimating Health Utilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the U.S. population continues to age, there is a growing need to improve the process and technologies of advance care planning for older adults with chronic disease to ensure that the care they receive is aligned with their personal preferences, priorities, and values (Sherbourne & Stewart, 1991;Bernard, 1994;Doing Qualitative Research: Methods for Primary Care, 1999;Kroenke & Spitzer, 2002;Horsman, Furlong, Feeny, & Torrance, 2003;Bakitas et al, 2004;Patel, Sinuff, & Cook, 2004;Callahan et al, 2005;Katon et al, 2005;Austrom et al, 2006;Callahan et al, 2006;Spitzer, Kroenke, Williams, & Lowe, 2006;S. R. Counsell et al, 2007;Department of Health, 2008;Steven R Counsell, Callahan, Tu, Stump, & Arling, 2009;Glaser & Strauss, 2009;Baughman et al, 2012;Working Group on Health Outcomes for Older Persons with Multiple Chronic Conditions, 2012;Cottingham AH, 2014;Kirolos et al, 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Patient populations often include seniors with dementia [14], depression [21][22][23][24][25], arthritis [26], as well as minority groups [22], veterans [13], house-bound [11,12], complex [27], palliative [18], and low-income seniors [28]. Evaluations of interdisciplinary teams have mainly focused on patient and their informal caregivers [11,19,29]. Enhanced care processes of reduced wait times to access specialized services, increased pneumonia vaccination rates, and improved medication prescribing were reported (19,20,30).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%