2023
DOI: 10.1080/13696998.2023.2173466
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of idecabtagene vicleucel compared with conventional care in triple-class exposed relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients in Canada and France

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both ide-cel and cilta-cel showed clinically meaningful response rates in singlearm trials [38,39] and demonstrated improvements in outcomes compared to currently available therapies in triple-class-exposed relapsed and refractory MM patients, as derived from adjusted indirect comparisons [40,41]. These gene therapies are still awaiting reimbursement decisions in Spain [31], and the expectation is that their costs will be extremely elevated, as ide-cel's cost in France exceeds EUR 350,000 [42], with financing conditions including payments based on outcomes, similar to other gene therapies [43]. Furthermore, both ide-cel and cilta-cel have demonstrated efficacy in earlier treatment lines [44,45], thus potentially increasing the number of patients who may be candidates for these treatments in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both ide-cel and cilta-cel showed clinically meaningful response rates in singlearm trials [38,39] and demonstrated improvements in outcomes compared to currently available therapies in triple-class-exposed relapsed and refractory MM patients, as derived from adjusted indirect comparisons [40,41]. These gene therapies are still awaiting reimbursement decisions in Spain [31], and the expectation is that their costs will be extremely elevated, as ide-cel's cost in France exceeds EUR 350,000 [42], with financing conditions including payments based on outcomes, similar to other gene therapies [43]. Furthermore, both ide-cel and cilta-cel have demonstrated efficacy in earlier treatment lines [44,45], thus potentially increasing the number of patients who may be candidates for these treatments in the near future.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%