2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2017.02.011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of Evolocumab in Patients With High Cardiovascular Risk in Spain

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
54
0
3

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(60 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
54
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The three Amgen papers analysed evolocumab compared with standard of care (typically statins) from a Spanish perspective in one paper and a US perspective in two others (12)(13)(14). The main differences between the two US papers were that the one by Fonarow and colleagues from 2017 (12) had incorporated results from the recently published FOURIER trial, which reported effect on myocardial infarction and stroke.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The three Amgen papers analysed evolocumab compared with standard of care (typically statins) from a Spanish perspective in one paper and a US perspective in two others (12)(13)(14). The main differences between the two US papers were that the one by Fonarow and colleagues from 2017 (12) had incorporated results from the recently published FOURIER trial, which reported effect on myocardial infarction and stroke.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Spanish study concluded that evolocumab was cost-effective for a population of FH patients where the majority had established CVD with an ICER at EUR€30,893 per QALY. For secondary prevention of non-FH patients, it reported an ICER of EUR€45,340 per QALY, which would typically be considered not cost-effective according to cost-effectiveness thresholds in Spain (14).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…102 A Spanish study modelled the effects of evolocumab when added to standard of care for patients with FH or a prior ACVD event. 116 It found substantially lower cost per QALY, of~$70 000 for patients with FH and $45 000 in secondary prevention. Notably, the modelled annual cost of intervention was about a third of that used in the studies from the USA.…”
Section: Neurocognitive Effectsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…A Spanish study modelled the effects of evolocumab when added to standard of care for patients with FH or a prior ACVD event . It found substantially lower cost per QALY, of ~$70 000 for patients with FH and $45 000 in secondary prevention.…”
Section: Anti‐pcsk9 Monoclonal Antibodiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some have indicated that the incremental cost of adding a PCSK9 inhibitor is prohibitive without significant discounting, [27][28][29] whereas others claimed that incorporation of PCSK9 inhibitor treatment in patients with clinical ASCVD or with heterozygous FH would be below the benchmark or willingness to pay threshold for a quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained (typically $50,000 to $100,000/year). 30,31 These contrasting findings may be due to a number of factors, including the setting (US or a single country in Europe), drug costs, patient characteristics (clinical setting, baseline age, background therapy, and baseline LDL-C levels), the estimated LDL-C and event reductions (either modeled, or based on registry or trial data), the extent to which indirect costs (which are related to productivity losses due to cardiovascular events) were incorporated, and the time horizon and perspective of the health economic analysis. There are health systems around the world, in Australia for example, where the use of this class of drugs in non-FH is only available by private prescription at this stage.…”
Section: Clinical Challenges In Preventing Ascvd By Ldl-cholesterol Lmentioning
confidence: 99%