2008
DOI: 10.1590/s1413-86702008000500005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of entecavir versus lamivudine for the suppression of viral replication in chronic hepatitis B Patients in Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
3
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
8
3
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The national health status in Yemen has been in steady growth recently due to the concerted efforts to educate the public about the importance of immunization in the fight against infectious childhood diseases in minimizing mortality rate. However, our study showed lower coverage compared to endemic developed [25] and developing [26] countries, where HBV vaccine coverage rates among children ranged from 90 to 98%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…The national health status in Yemen has been in steady growth recently due to the concerted efforts to educate the public about the importance of immunization in the fight against infectious childhood diseases in minimizing mortality rate. However, our study showed lower coverage compared to endemic developed [25] and developing [26] countries, where HBV vaccine coverage rates among children ranged from 90 to 98%.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 63%
“…In addition, most studies performed in the US [8-14], Australia [15], and Asia [16,17] demonstrated that entecavir was superior when compared with lamivudine. Another study by Buti et al showed that tenofovir was the better cost-effective treatment when compared with entecavir, telvibudine, and adefovir [13].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even taking into account the differences between the studies, the results of the sensitivity analysis were consistent with the observations of the literature for HBeAg positive and negative patients. 3,7,23 Adherence to the treatment, the natural history of the disease, failure to use rates of natural mortality apart from the use of estimates obtained from the literature and the extrapolation of the rates for rescue therapy are all limitations of this study. Low levels of adhesion to the treatment may reduce patients' response to it, compromising its effectiveness against the progression of the disease.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…25 Costa et al undertook a study with a ten-year-timeframe comparing entecavir with lamivudine in HBeAg positive and negative patients. 7 Those who developed resistance to lamivudine had adefovir added to their treatment. The study used the following three parameters to judge the treatment's success: percentage of patients who attained undetectable levels of viral load, YAL and the quality of life adjusted to those years gained (QALY).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%