2020
DOI: 10.2471/blt.19.241158
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost–effectiveness of emergency care interventions in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There is a mounting body of evidence demonstrating the impact of emergency care in LMICs [ 9 , 10 ]; however, not enough is known about the cost and resources required to achieve these gains. The existing body of cost-effectiveness literature is methodologically weak, often failing to use empirically derived local inputs, and focused on analysing single-intervention rather than the cost-effectiveness of system changes and process improvements [ 11 ]. Electronic medical records, digital billing systems, and dedicated emergency unit budgets available in high-income settings have supported efforts to evaluate the costs for many EC interventions in these settings [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There is a mounting body of evidence demonstrating the impact of emergency care in LMICs [ 9 , 10 ]; however, not enough is known about the cost and resources required to achieve these gains. The existing body of cost-effectiveness literature is methodologically weak, often failing to use empirically derived local inputs, and focused on analysing single-intervention rather than the cost-effectiveness of system changes and process improvements [ 11 ]. Electronic medical records, digital billing systems, and dedicated emergency unit budgets available in high-income settings have supported efforts to evaluate the costs for many EC interventions in these settings [ 12 , 13 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…29 Based on this standard, thrombolytics for acute stroke treatment are not a cost-effective investment, at least for low-income countries. 30 Moreover, an increase in indirect cost should be accounted for given the tradeoff between improving life expectancy and potentially increasing morbidity.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…EPs are paid well (around 4.5-5 lakh Indian currency per month) in Arab countries; as per Western literature, EPs enjoy several financial advantages. [ 9 10 11 12 ] In the 2018 Medscape Physician Compensation Report, EM was ranked 13th of 29 specialities, with an average income of $350,000/annual. EPs generally earn a total compensation of more than $200 per hour and sometimes more than $300 per hour.…”
Section: Global Appeal and Economical/financial Aspects Of Emmentioning
confidence: 99%