2004
DOI: 10.1007/s10227-004-0111-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost Effectiveness of Elidel in the Management of Patients with Atopic Dermatitis in Canada

Abstract: Elidel will lead to an overall increase in costs but with an improvement in clinical outcomes. The cost effectiveness ratios for Elidel were consistently below 50,000 dollars per QALY gained. Given previous funding decisions in Canada, Elidel may be considered a cost-effective use of health care resources.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…PIM is not recommended in these pts (section 8). [85] In general, sensitivity analyses revealed these pharmacoeconomic models to be robust. In these models, the calculated incremental cost per QALY gained are within the generally accepted threshold of these countries.…”
Section: Pharmacoeconomic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…PIM is not recommended in these pts (section 8). [85] In general, sensitivity analyses revealed these pharmacoeconomic models to be robust. In these models, the calculated incremental cost per QALY gained are within the generally accepted threshold of these countries.…”
Section: Pharmacoeconomic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The cost effectiveness of topical pimecrolimus relative to vehicle [85][86][87][88] or to topical tacrolimus [89] in the treatment of pediatric patients with atopic dermatitis has been examined in five pharmacoeconomic analyses. Comparisons between topical pimecrolimus and vehicle were based on the addition of conventional therapy, consisting of regular use of emollients and topical corticosteroids when needed.…”
Section: Pharmacoeconomic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Topical pimecrolimus plus conventional therapy (regular use of emollients and topical corticosteroids as needed) was a costeffective treatment relative to vehicle plus conventional therapy in Canadian [30] and US [31] cost-utility analyses. However, first-line topical corticosteroids dominated second-line topical pimecrolimus following first-line topical corticosteroids in two UK pharmacoeconomic analyses.…”
Section: Pharmacoeconomic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%