Cost-Effectiveness of Carbon Emission Abatement Strategies for a Local Multi-Energy System—A Case Study of Chalmers University of Technology Campus

Abstract

This paper investigates the cost-effectiveness of operation strategies which can be used to abate CO 2 emissions in a local multi-energy system. A case study is carried out using data from a real energy system that integrates district heating, district cooling, and electricity networks at Chalmers University of Technology. Operation strategies are developed using a mixed integer linear programming multi-objective optimization model with a short foresight rolling horizon and a year of data. The cost-effectiveness of different strategies is evaluated across different carbon prices. The results provide insights into developing abatement strategies for local multi-energy systems that could be used by utilities, building owners, and authorities. The optimized abatement strategies include: increased usage of biomass boilers, substitution of district heating and absorption chillers with heat pumps, and higher utilization of storage units. The results show that, by utilizing all the strategies, a 20.8% emission reduction can be achieved with a 2.2% cost increase for the campus area. The emission abatement cost of all strategies is 36.6–100.2 (€/tCO 2 ), which is aligned with estimated carbon prices if the Paris agreement target is to be achieved. It is higher, however, than average European Emission Trading System prices and Sweden’s carbon tax in 2019.

Multi-Energy School System for Seasonal Use in the Mediterranean Area

“…Moreover, despite the evident advantages in the diffusion of these systems, as shown by the sector literature [15,16], there is still some reluctance by some regulators and public utilities that needs to be overcome, as it has numerous technical, regulatory and commercial obstacles [13]. For this reason, several universities, research centers, engineers and experts in energy and sustainability have conducted their research to promote the diffusion of the energy districts through new applications and studies that reduce the reluctances expressed and contribute to the achievement of the environmental objectives.…”

“…Cortés et al [19] analyzed a smart energy microgrid district in the Canary Islands characterized by several households and a school building that included photovoltaic plants, domestic hot water (DHW) heaters and a pool for the balance of energy consumption. Alavijeh et al [16] analyzed the cost-effectiveness of CO 2 reduction strategies in a multi-energy system at the Chalmers University of Technology, for heating, cooling and electrical energy services. Rosato et al [20] have modeled in a TRNSYS environment [21] a hybrid district heating system based on solar and geothermal energy sources with seasonal storage to satisfy the thermal needs of an energy district consisting of six residential buildings and three schools in Naples.…”

CO2 Intensities and Primary Energy Factors in the Future European Electricity System

“…Many of the previous academic studies in which marginal conversion factors are used do not consider several countries or future timeframes (e.g., [31,39,42,72,73]). Similar studies that are performed in the future could alleviate these limitations by using the marginal conversion factors that are contained in the presented database.…”

Graph-Based Optimization for Technology Pathway Analysis: A Case Study in the Decarbonization of University Campuses

“…This modeling approach requires detailed data for investment costs, operating costs, operating lifetimes, and scaling factors for the technologies proposed and time-dependent demand data to determine a minimized cost scenario with no emissions. Other modeling approaches have used multiobjective optimization to determine technology operations that can help reach emissions reduction targets, determine the lowest cost for maximum renewable use, and determine the cost of reducing emissions. − Existing optimization models are typically intended to provide long-term investment plans to achieve decarbonization. Besides models seeking to decarbonize, technology selection and the general exploration of pathways can be seen applied frequently in the conversion of a raw feedstock or waste product to more valuable products. − These approaches often take the approach of a cost minimization but can also seek to maximize the yield or a measure of the economic potential or profit.…”