2022
DOI: 10.3390/cancers14071729
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness of Artificial Intelligence Support in Computed Tomography-Based Lung Cancer Screening

Abstract: Background: Lung cancer screening is already implemented in the USA and strongly recommended by European Radiological and Thoracic societies as well. Upon implementation, the total number of thoracic computed tomographies (CT) is likely to rise significantly. As shown in previous studies, modern artificial intelligence-based algorithms are on-par or even exceed radiologist’s performance in lung nodule detection and classification. Therefore, the aim of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of an AI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(43 reference statements)
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Threshold analysis showed that ICER remained negative until the $68 threshold to support AI applications. Thus, using a mono system for analyzing LDCT data using AI for SRL is a reasonable diagnostic strategy for cost-effectiveness [54].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Main Results Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Threshold analysis showed that ICER remained negative until the $68 threshold to support AI applications. Thus, using a mono system for analyzing LDCT data using AI for SRL is a reasonable diagnostic strategy for cost-effectiveness [54].…”
Section: Discussion Of the Main Results Of The Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A recent study conducted by Ziegelmayer S and colleagues assessed the cost-effectiveness of implementing an AI algorithm in the initial round of LC screening through the use of Markov simulation. The findings of the study indicate that incorporating AI assistance during the initial screening phase proves to be a cost-effective approach, with a maximum cost of 1,240 USD per patient, assuming a willingness to pay 100,000 USD for quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) [15]. QALYs are a measure of disease burden that combines both the quality and quantity of life lived, and are commonly used in economic evaluations of medical interventions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The diagnostic accuracy in guiding genotype directed therapy was 97%, and the average time to start treatment was less than one day ( 68 ). CT combined with AI resulted in a negative incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) compared to CT only, showing lower costs and higher effectiveness ( 69 ). The lowest net cost savings using AI-informed management strategies are estimated at $72 per screened patient ( 70 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%