2022
DOI: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2022.101496
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroids and tocolytic agents in the management of preterm birth: A systematic review

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 72 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Economic evidence shows that ACS is highly cost-effective, including in low-resource countries. 35,36 The GDG did not recommend in favour of late preterm ACS use, in light of the continuing uncertainties around the benefits and harms in this subgroup and the lack of substantive trial evidence from low-resource countries. The GDG was also aware that trials exploring late preterm ACS use are continuing, and elected to await these results before revisiting this recommendation.…”
Section: W Ho 2 022 R Ecom M E N Dations On Ac S To I M Prov E Pr Ete...mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Economic evidence shows that ACS is highly cost-effective, including in low-resource countries. 35,36 The GDG did not recommend in favour of late preterm ACS use, in light of the continuing uncertainties around the benefits and harms in this subgroup and the lack of substantive trial evidence from low-resource countries. The GDG was also aware that trials exploring late preterm ACS use are continuing, and elected to await these results before revisiting this recommendation.…”
Section: W Ho 2 022 R Ecom M E N Dations On Ac S To I M Prov E Pr Ete...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter review highlighted that ensuring appropriate ACS use needs accurate gestational age assessment, consistent guidelines and training for providers, as well as sufficient supplies and trained, well‐supported staff. Economic evidence shows that ACS is highly cost‐effective, including in low‐resource countries 35,36 . The GDG did not recommend in favour of late preterm ACS use, in light of the continuing uncertainties around the benefits and harms in this subgroup and the lack of substantive trial evidence from low‐resource countries.…”
Section: Who 2022 Recommendations On Acs To Improve Preterm Birth Out...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Six previous studies analysed the cost-effectiveness of antenatal corticosteroid use in early preterm birth; four from high-income countries (the Netherlands, the UK, and the USA) and one from an upper-middleincome country (Brazil). [4][5][6][7][8]13 A modelling study in the Netherlands in 1992 used published cost and efficacy estimates and found that use of antenatal corticosteroids was cost-effective for neonatal survival. 7 The other four studies found that antenatal corticosteroids for early preterm birth was dominant (ie, cost-saving) compared with no intervention due to the reduced need for neonatal interventions, which is consistent with this current study.…”
Section: Figure 3: Cost-effectiveness Plane Of Antenatal Intramuscula...mentioning
confidence: 99%