2018
DOI: 10.1111/myc.12801
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost‐effectiveness of amphotericin B formulations in the treatment of systemic fungal infections

Abstract: Amphotericin formulations, indicated for invasive fungal infections (IFIs), vary in effectiveness, safety and costs. In Brazil, only the conventional formulation is provided by the Public Health System. The aim of this study was to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis comparing conventional amphotericin B (CAB), liposomal amphotericin B (LAB) and amphotericin B lipid complex (ABLC). Therefore, a decision tree was developed. The model began with high-risking patients on suspicion or confirmation of IFI. The an… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Conventional formulations are usually affordable but include significant side effects. The most effective and least toxic formulation is liposomal AmB, which can generate costs of up to US$100,000 per patient in different parts of the globe, including developing countries [28].…”
Section: Systemic Mycoses Are Neglected Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conventional formulations are usually affordable but include significant side effects. The most effective and least toxic formulation is liposomal AmB, which can generate costs of up to US$100,000 per patient in different parts of the globe, including developing countries [28].…”
Section: Systemic Mycoses Are Neglected Diseasesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, due to the high cost of the lipid formulations, in resource-limited settings that rely only on the conventional AmB formulation for the treatment of systemic fungal infections, extemporaneous fat emulsions have been alternatively prepared by mixing AmB-DOC with Intralipid ® 20%, a low-cost commercial water-in-oil (O/W) emulsion for parenteral nutrition containing 20% (w/v) soybean oil [130,131]. AmB-DOC in Intralipid ® (AmB-IL) has shown antifungal efficacy in vitro [132] and in vivo in experimental animal models of systemic candidiasis [133,134] and aspergillosis [135], similar to that of the conventional formulation in dextrose but decreased nephrotoxicity and infusion-related side effects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was estimated that the cost to procure one million doses of standard benzimidazoles (500 mg each) would be approximately US$ 20,000, including international transport (37). In comparison to the cost of treating cryptococcosis patients with lipid formulations of amphotericin B (8, 9), these numbers are extraordinarily low. In this context, our results support the development of pharmaceutical preparations of fenbendazole to be tested as alternative anti-cryptococcal agents.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Malawi, Zambia, Cameroon, and Tanzania, the costs for treating each patient with cryptococcal meningitis includes US $1442 for 2 weeks of oral fluconazole and flucytosine, $1763 for 1 week of amphotericin B and fluconazole, $1861 for 1 week of amphotericin B and flucytosine, $2125 for 2 weeks of amphotericin B and fluconazole, and $2285 for 2 weeks of amphotericin B and flucytosine (7). In Brazil, the therapeutic costs of lipid formulations of amphotericin B can exceed US $100,000 per patient (8). In summary, novel therapeutic protocols for treating the diseases caused by C. neoformans and C. gattii are urgent.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%