2006
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2005.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness of alternative investment strategies for the power sector in India: A retrospective account of the period 1997–2002

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In reality, they acted as quasi-government administrative bodies that were indifferent to economic incentives, cost recovery, or issues of technological innovation and efficiency gains (Ruet 2005(Ruet , 2006. Indeed, the structures such organisational design set in place created perverse incentives.…”
Section: India's Energy Sector: Historical Legacies In the Policy Envmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In reality, they acted as quasi-government administrative bodies that were indifferent to economic incentives, cost recovery, or issues of technological innovation and efficiency gains (Ruet 2005(Ruet , 2006. Indeed, the structures such organisational design set in place created perverse incentives.…”
Section: India's Energy Sector: Historical Legacies In the Policy Envmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This, in turn, had knock on consequences and denuded revenues that would otherwise have been set aside for re-investment and capacity enhancement in the sector. Perhaps most disappointing of all, however, was the fact that the OERC found itself unable to change political subsidisation in the sector, setting in place tariff structures that once again resulted in financial losses (Thillai 2003;Ruet 2006;Kundu and Mishra 2011).…”
Section: Second Phase: the World Bank Push And Distribution Reformsmentioning
confidence: 99%