it. Costs are only established for improvements and expressed as a percentage increase against a base figure that is undisclosed.A recent study carried out by Energy Saving Trust [9] has focused solely on fabric improvements in the same way as this study will do; it sets out improvement measures that can be applied to masonry, timber frame and steel frame construction to improve the overall thermal transmittance, U-values. They have found that through its improvement measures an average of 25% reduction over the target emission rate for the dwelling can be made. However, they have not provided the costs for floor, roof and window improvement measures, and this information is critical for homeowners, and can be the deciding factors in the decision to embark on home improvements.Communities and Local Government [10] have analysed the potential costs of achieving all levels of the code for sustainable homes. They have investigated many ways of reducing carbon emission rather than just looking at the building fabric. Langdon [6,7] have explored many types of low and zero carbon technologies along with varying levels of building fabric upgrades to reduce carbon emissions of seven different building types. All improvement scenarios used to achieve increasing levels of carbon reductions always include improvements to the building fabric first confirming the importance of building fabric on energy performance. Their study used the dwelling base model as presented by Turner and Townsend [5] to assess the improvement measures. However, they did not include the costs of these proposed alterations to the construction methods. By concentrating on improving the fabric of existing domestic buildings the need for space heating and
AbstractThis paper examines the thermal performance of housing in the UK and the associated costs for different fabric construction methods of the envelope for a typical four bedroom detached house. The energy ratings were assessed using the UK Government's Standard Assessment Procedure (SAP), which is based on the Building Research Establishment Domestic Energy Model. The capital costs were estimated from data published by the Building Cost Information Services applied to Leicester UK area in 2011. Through alterations to the dwelling fabric alone, a reduction of 30.1% in carbon emissions of the base property could be achieved. Standard methods proved to be as effective as alternative methods at reducing carbon emissions by 22.6% for an average capital cost increase of 9.1% against the base property. This was equivalent to an extra cost of £13.7 for each kg of CO 2 emissions reduction. It was found that alternative methods could reduce carbon emissions by 20.5% for an extra cost of 18.4% over the base property. The optimum construction method that would help achieve the UK government's carbon emissions target was also discussed. The paper also discusses the methods for improving energy efficiency in existing dwellings, using a typical solid-wall terraced house with a new single storey extension, as a...