Cost-effectiveness and implementation process of a running-related injury prevention program (RunIn3): Protocol of a randomized controlled trial

Barros, Pamela Marinelli; Vallio, Caio Sain; Oliveira, Gabriela Martins de; Miyamoto, Gisela Cristiane; Hespanhol, Luiz

doi:10.1016/j.conctc.2021.100726

Cited by 4 publications

(4 citation statements)

References 51 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Stage 4 ('evaluating efficacy in ideal conditions') will be addressed in a pragmatic hybrid type 1 randomised controlled trial. 33 Stage 5 ('describing the intervention context to inform implementation strategies') and stage 6 ('evaluating effectiveness in implementation context') will be partly addressed in the pragmatic hybrid type 1 randomised controlled trial 33 and partly addressed in future implementation studies yet to be designed based on the results of the trial.…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…17 In this study, the participatory approach directly involved the running community (runners, coaches, health professionals, researchers and stakeholders) in discussions of the entire programme development process and in designing the pragmatic hybrid type 1 randomised controlled trial aimed at addressing step 6 of IM. 33 The benefit of involving the community was the tailoring to the real needs, preferences and reality of the running environment, which may contribute to a successful implementation of the running-related injury prevention programme. 35…”

Section: Patient and Public Involvementmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A detailed explanation on the implementation process of the RunIn3 prevention programme can be found elsewhere. 33 Step 6: evaluation planning The RunIn3 prevention programme will be evaluated through a pragmatic hybrid type 1 randomised controlled trial. The protocol describing the methods in detail can be found elsewhere.…”

Section: Step 5: Adoption and Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The protocol describing the methods in detail can be found elsewhere. 33 The randomised controlled trial has been prospectively registered in ClinicalTrials. gov under the identifier NCT03892239.…”

Section: Step 5: Adoption and Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

RunIn3: the development process of a running-related injury prevention programme

Vallio

Oliveira

Mota

et al. 2021

BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BackgroundRunning is an important type of exercise to keep people physically active. However, running also carries a risk of developing running-related injuries (RRI). Therefore, effective and evidence-based RRI prevention programmes are desirable, but are scarce in practice. An approach to face this problem might be the application of methods to develop RRI prevention programmes based on theories of behaviour change.ObjectiveThe purpose of the study was to develop an RRI prevention programme based on perspectives of behavioural and social science theories, as well as taking a framework development approach.MethodsThis was a qualitative study using the Intervention Mapping (IM) framework held between February and March 2018 in São Paulo, Brazil. The participants were involved in running practice. The data collection was conducted during focus group meetings. The data analysis was based on semantic thematic approach using a content analysis orientation based on inductive reasoning.ResultsThe target population of the RRI prevention programme identified was ‘adult recreational runners’. The objectives of the RRI prevention programme were established in two broad actions: (1) to provide feedback on individual training characteristics and RRI risk; and (2) provide/enhance knowledge, skills and self-efficacy on RRI preventive behaviours. The programme is aimed to be delivered through an online system.ConclusionAn RRI prevention programme was developed using the IM framework and a participatory approach. The programme was named ‘RunIn3’, and it is based on providing feedback on running volume and RRI risk, as well as providing knowledge, skills and self-efficacy on RRI preventive behaviours.

show abstract

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Patient and Public Involvementmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Step 5: Adoption and Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Step 5: Adoption and Implementationmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations