2019
DOI: 10.1055/s-0039-3401822
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness and Budget Impact of Emicizumab Prophylaxis in Haemophilia A Patients with Inhibitors

Abstract: Recent evidence demonstrated that weekly prophylaxis with subcutaneous bispecific antibody (emicizumab) has shown higher efficacy in adolescent and adults patients affected by haemophilia A (HA) with inhibitor, compared with patients treated on demand or on prophylaxis with bypassing agents (BPAs). However, no economic evaluations assessing the value and sustainability of emicizumab prophylaxis have been performed in Europe. This study assessed the cost-effectiveness of emicizumab prophylaxis compared with BPA… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
38
0
2

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
1
38
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…26 Notably, emicizumab prophylaxis during ITI was well tolerated; 27 nonetheless, co-administration of FVIII and emicizumab may pose a substantial financial burden on healthcare systems. 28 Prospective studies will be necessary to compare treatment outcomes of a combined ITI and emicizumab regimen with a standard ITI or emicizumab prophylaxis-only regimen and to investigate whether emicizumab prophylaxis modifies the immunologic response to FVIII. 27 Breakthrough bleeds occurred in 50% of the patients in our group, which is slightly higher than rates reported in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…26 Notably, emicizumab prophylaxis during ITI was well tolerated; 27 nonetheless, co-administration of FVIII and emicizumab may pose a substantial financial burden on healthcare systems. 28 Prospective studies will be necessary to compare treatment outcomes of a combined ITI and emicizumab regimen with a standard ITI or emicizumab prophylaxis-only regimen and to investigate whether emicizumab prophylaxis modifies the immunologic response to FVIII. 27 Breakthrough bleeds occurred in 50% of the patients in our group, which is slightly higher than rates reported in previous studies.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…105 A recent cost-effectiveness analysis, comprising a Markov model and a budget impact model, further substantiates the findings of previous studies. 106…”
Section: Economic Considerationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several studies have reported cost‐effectiveness of emicizumab prophylaxis, and emicizumab was considered a cost‐saving option in all previous studies; however, these previous studies differed regarding methods and aspects such as choice of comparator, demographic characteristics of the study cohorts and time horizon. Cortesi et al assessed cost‐effectiveness of emicizumab prophylaxis in HAPI over throughout their lifetime from the Italian perspective; however, in contrast to our study, they compared emicizumab prophylaxis with BPA prophylaxis and the starting age of their cohort was 4 years, which may explain differences in results 35 . Patel et al assessed cost‐effectiveness of emicizumab prophylaxis compared with factor VIII prophylaxis in severe haemophilia A patients without inhibitors by estimating the economic impact over 20 years, beginning at age 1 36 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 59%