2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3202879
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Thermotherapy Versus Pentavalent Antimonials for the Treatment of Cutaneous Leishmaniasis

Abstract: Objective: The treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis is toxic, has contraindications, and a high cost. The objective of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of thermotherapy versus pentavalent antimonials for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis. Methods: Effectiveness was the proportion of healing and safety with the adverse effects; these parameters were estimated from a controlled clinical trial and a meta-analysis. A standard costing was conducted. Average and incremental cost-effectiveness… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
(22 reference statements)
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…guyanensis [ 1 , 4 ]. The standard treatment is still parenteral injections of meglumine antimoniate, 20 mg/kg/day/20 days, despite its cost (USD 60–550 per course) [ 7 ], variable efficacy of between approximately 36% and 95%, and toxicity [ 8 10 ]. Miltefosine, 2.5 mg/kg/day for 28 days is also available, but is only used in cases where subjects do not respond to meglumine antimoniate or its use is contraindicated [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…guyanensis [ 1 , 4 ]. The standard treatment is still parenteral injections of meglumine antimoniate, 20 mg/kg/day/20 days, despite its cost (USD 60–550 per course) [ 7 ], variable efficacy of between approximately 36% and 95%, and toxicity [ 8 10 ]. Miltefosine, 2.5 mg/kg/day for 28 days is also available, but is only used in cases where subjects do not respond to meglumine antimoniate or its use is contraindicated [ 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors highlighted that according to the WHO-CHOICE criteria, treatment in Chaparral is not a cost-effective health intervention and may not even be justifiable from an economic point of view. Cardona-Arias et al 13 compared the cost effectiveness of thermotherapy and pentavalent antimonial for the treatment of CL. The thermotherapy showed average cost-effectiveness ratios ranging between $187 and $390, and Glucantime between $721 and $1,275.…”
Section: Economic Analysis Of Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%