2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2016.10.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Preoperative Versus Postoperative Radiation Therapy in Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcoma

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, preoperative RT may provide substantial benefit for patients with locally advanced disease, allowing conservative or limb-sparing surgery in marginally-resectable or unresectable STS (5). Finally, costeffectiveness analysis supports preoperative RT in STS (6).…”
Section: Rationale For Preoperative Approachmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Moreover, preoperative RT may provide substantial benefit for patients with locally advanced disease, allowing conservative or limb-sparing surgery in marginally-resectable or unresectable STS (5). Finally, costeffectiveness analysis supports preoperative RT in STS (6).…”
Section: Rationale For Preoperative Approachmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…Compared with post-operative RT, pre-operative RT is associated with a reduced risk of late complications, such as fibrosis and joint stiffness [8] , [10] , [13] , [14] , [15] . These reduced late complications are potentially further associated with improved long-term functional outcomes and decreased healthcare costs [16] . Yet, pre-operative RT also has disadvantages.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All p values calculated using the Kruskal-Wallis test. complications are potentially further associated with improved long-term functional outcomes and decreased healthcare costs[16]. Yet, pre-operative RT also has disadvantages.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[19] Due to a lower incidence of chronic adverse effects with RTx in the preoperative setting, neoadjuvant RTx also seems to be more cost effective. [20] While the timing of RTx most likely has a minimal (if at all) effect on local control and overall survival, it is essential with regards to wound healing, functional outcome and most important on starting any postoperative sarcoma therapy. It is less likely that a patient irradiated after surgery will display severe wound healing impairment.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%