2012
DOI: 10.3111/13696998.2012.672942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effectiveness analysis of palivizumab among pre-term infant populations covered by Medicaid in the United States

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
32
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
1
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…24 Economic evaluations sponsored by the manufacturer of palivizumab suggest cost neutrality or even cost savings. [124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134] In contrast, analyses conducted by independent investigators consistently demonstrate the cost of palivizumab prophylaxis far exceeds the economic benefit of hospital avoidance, even among infants at highest risk. 24,25,[39][40][41][42]46,90,[135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143] Variation in results are explained by differences in study methodology and different base case assumptions used in the model, such as incidence of RSV hospitalization for different risk groups, effectiveness of prophylaxis in reducing hospitalization rate by risk group, estimates of cost of prophylaxis and RSV hospitalizations avoided, number of doses administered, estimated age and weight of infants, and inclusion of a theoretical benefit on mortality reduction.…”
Section: Cost Analysesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…24 Economic evaluations sponsored by the manufacturer of palivizumab suggest cost neutrality or even cost savings. [124][125][126][127][128][129][130][131][132][133][134] In contrast, analyses conducted by independent investigators consistently demonstrate the cost of palivizumab prophylaxis far exceeds the economic benefit of hospital avoidance, even among infants at highest risk. 24,25,[39][40][41][42]46,90,[135][136][137][138][139][140][141][142][143] Variation in results are explained by differences in study methodology and different base case assumptions used in the model, such as incidence of RSV hospitalization for different risk groups, effectiveness of prophylaxis in reducing hospitalization rate by risk group, estimates of cost of prophylaxis and RSV hospitalizations avoided, number of doses administered, estimated age and weight of infants, and inclusion of a theoretical benefit on mortality reduction.…”
Section: Cost Analysesmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…[120] Recommendations for the use of palivizumab for prevention of RSV infections in high-risk infants have been published by the American Academy of Pediatrics [121] and been adopted by many national committees. Recently, cost effectiveness of palivizumab prophylaxis was demonstrated in very low birth weight infants [122,123] and those with BPD. [124] At least a Cochrane meta-analysis revealed evidence that palivizumab prophylaxis is effective in reducing the frequency of hospitalisations due to RSV infection, i.e.…”
Section: Review Articlementioning
confidence: 99%
“…age having equal or less than one risk factor [36]. A European cost-effectiveness study based on nationwide long-term epidemiologic data (including 1579 children hospitalized because of RSV LRTI during 16 seasons) from Austria confirmed these results for preterm infants below 33 weeks, those of 33 to 35 weeks of gestational age, those with BPD, and at least those with CHD; the latter demonstrating the lowest costs per quality-adjusted life years [37].…”
Section: Efficacy and Economic Aspects Of Palivizumabmentioning
confidence: 98%