2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2015.03.015
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Morcellation Hysterectomy for Myomas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
2

Year Published

2015
2015
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(32 reference statements)
0
13
2
Order By: Relevance
“…However, other studies have noted that open laparotomies are not cost-effective compared with laparoscopic myomectomies. 30 Our study demonstrated that the prevalence of LMS is actually higher than previously reported and occurs in a younger population, which challenges these studies and possibly indicates that screening is the optimal approach.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…However, other studies have noted that open laparotomies are not cost-effective compared with laparoscopic myomectomies. 30 Our study demonstrated that the prevalence of LMS is actually higher than previously reported and occurs in a younger population, which challenges these studies and possibly indicates that screening is the optimal approach.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…Siedhoff and colleagues counter this thought in their hypothetical analysis demonstrating minimal difference in open and laparoscopic myomectomies based on previously reported prevalence data at the time of myomectomies. However, other studies have noted that open laparotomies are not cost‐effective compared with laparoscopic myomectomies . Our study demonstrated that the prevalence of LMS is actually higher than previously reported and occurs in a younger population, which challenges these studies and possibly indicates that screening is the optimal approach.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 67%
“…Recent cost effectiveness analyses support the use of morcellation in low-risk populations, citing lowerratesofintraoperativeandperioperative complications, 65,66 fewer overall deaths, 65,66 andlowersocietalcostsduetoshorterhospitalizations and fewer days lost from work compared with laparotomy. 66,67 Quality of life analyses have yielded conflicting results [65][66][67] ; however, ageseems to be the driving factor in determining the effectiveness of morcellation. 65,66 Younger women seem to benefit from the procedure; however, as the risk of occult malignancy increases with age, the risks outweigh the benefits.…”
Section: Recommendations/future Directions/cost Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 A cost-effectiveness analysis of this technique revealed the cost to prevent a single case of disseminated malignancy was a little more than $10.5 million. 16 A number of surgeons, recognizing the potential benefit of minimally invasive approaches and cognizant of the risk of potentially upstaging a malignancy, are researching innovative ways to morcellate in contained spaces. Regardless, the road ahead has already been forever altered as a result of lay press coverage of what we as physicians choose as part of our surgical armamentarium.…”
Section: Power Morecellatorsmentioning
confidence: 99%