To the Editor:I read with great interest the article by Labib et al 1 titled "Cost Comparison of Microsurgery vs Endovascular Treatment for Ruptured Intracranial Aneurysms: A Propensity-Adjusted Analysis." As the title of this article states, the authors compared the cost of endovascular vs microsurgical treatment for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). A total of 384 patients with aSAH were included in this study. Of all patients, 234 (61%) patients underwent microsurgical treatment, whereas 150 (39%) received the endovascular intervention. Then, the authors compared the cost of index hospitalization and total cost between the 2 groups. The cost of index hospitalization and total cost in the endovascular group were significantly higher than in the microsurgical group. After propensity score matching (adjusted for age, sex, pre-existing comorbidities, Glasgow Coma Scale score, Hunt and Hess grade, Fischer grade, aneurysm type/size/location, and hydrocephalus requiring shunting.), linear regression analysis revealed that microsurgical clipping was associated with less total health care cost. Thorough cost analyses have shown that this discrepancy was due to differences in the rates of aneurysm retreatment and long-term surveillance. The authors concluded that microsurgical treatment for aSAH is associated with lower total health care costs than endovascular treatment. This study highlighted the different costs between microsurgery and endovascular treatment for patients with aSAH. By contrast, a recent study from Thailand has reported a cost-effectiveness analysis of endovascular coiling and neurosurgical clipping for aSAH and revealed that endovascular treatment for aSAH is cost-effective based on their national health insurance programs. 2 I greatly appreciate the effort of the authors in performing this study. However, there are certain limitations to this study that must be acknowledged.First, as presented in Table 1, the patients of the endovascular coiling group are older than that of the microsurgical clipping group, so these patients with slightly older age may be more prone to postoperative-related complications, thus further increasing the cost during hospitalization.