2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2014.08.2279
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Abiraterone Acetate Treatment Compared with Cabacitaxel in Dominican Republic, in Patients With Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer that Have Failed to Chemotherapy with Docetaxel

Abstract: Objectives: To assess the cost-effectiveness of Abiraterone Acetate plus Prednisone (A-P) compared with Cabazitaxel plus Prednisone (C-P) in Dominican Republic, in patients with Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer (mCRPC) that have failed to chemotherapy with Docetaxel. MethOds: A three-health state cohort simulation Markov Model (progression-free, post-progression and death) was developed based on overall and progression free survival data. The time frame was 10 years. The perspective was that of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, as the study by Zhong et al employed an 18-month time horizon, compared with a lifetime time horizon in this study, no comparison of the results can be made. Fifteen conference abstracts describing such analyses were additionally identified [ 36 50 ], but as these only provide limited data and barely any information on the methods employed, no informed comparisons with the results from this study can be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, as the study by Zhong et al employed an 18-month time horizon, compared with a lifetime time horizon in this study, no comparison of the results can be made. Fifteen conference abstracts describing such analyses were additionally identified [ 36 50 ], but as these only provide limited data and barely any information on the methods employed, no informed comparisons with the results from this study can be made.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%