2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.06.187
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effective reduction of micro pollutants in the water cycle – Case study on iodinated contrast media

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This cost is not expensive, making this approach economically feasible. Strehl et al estimated that adsorption treatment for the collected urine would cost ∼€5.4/patient (including €3.2 for the adsorbent and €2.2 for other costs) . Apparently, the AA/Cu­(II) approach in this study is much cheaper, has no solid waste management issues, and can achieve effective deiodination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This cost is not expensive, making this approach economically feasible. Strehl et al estimated that adsorption treatment for the collected urine would cost ∼€5.4/patient (including €3.2 for the adsorbent and €2.2 for other costs) . Apparently, the AA/Cu­(II) approach in this study is much cheaper, has no solid waste management issues, and can achieve effective deiodination.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Strehl et al estimated that adsorption treatment for the collected urine would cost ∼€5.4/patient (including €3.2 for the adsorbent and €2.2 for other costs). 76 Apparently, the AA/Cu(II) approach in this study is much cheaper, has no solid waste management issues, and can achieve effective deiodination. For practical application, the presence of other pharmaceuticals probably interferes with the reaction.…”
Section: Role Of Cu(i)mentioning
confidence: 89%
“…Urine interception, deployed at the patient level or hospital scale, may be used to capture and separate waste from patients on particular medicines such as cytostatic drugs and X‐ray contrast media (noPILLS in Waters, 2015; Stenuick, 2021; Strehl et al, 2019). At the hospital level, this can be achieved via specific toilets or urine bags, with the latter generally also considered a low‐cost intervention that can be easily implemented in routine hospital and at‐home patient treatments (OECD, 2022; Strehl et al, 2019).…”
Section: Waste and Wastewater Management Solutionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Advances in noncontrast techniques and artificial intelligence (AI) technologies allowing lower dose Gd scans 58 may reduce Gd usage. Urine bags are an effective, low‐cost measure to reduce contrast agent input into wastewater 59 . Given the low cost of mining raw Gd from ores, it seems economically unlikely that Gd recovery will be developed and employed at any scale.…”
Section: Potential Reduction Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%