2017 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP) 2017
DOI: 10.1109/icassp.2017.7952990
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-effective diffusion Kalman filtering with implicit measurement exchanges

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

5
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In Figure 2, the steady-state MSD of the proposed distributed Kalman filter is benchmarked against that of the diffusion Kalman filter (Algorithm 2 in [15]), the consensus Kalman filter (Algorithm 3 in [22]), and the distributed Kalman filter in [30]. Note that the proposed algorithm achieved a steadystate MSD close to that of the centralized Kalman filter and outperformed the consensus and diffusion schemes.…”
Section: A Distributed Filtering and Trackingmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In Figure 2, the steady-state MSD of the proposed distributed Kalman filter is benchmarked against that of the diffusion Kalman filter (Algorithm 2 in [15]), the consensus Kalman filter (Algorithm 3 in [22]), and the distributed Kalman filter in [30]. Note that the proposed algorithm achieved a steadystate MSD close to that of the centralized Kalman filter and outperformed the consensus and diffusion schemes.…”
Section: A Distributed Filtering and Trackingmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Note that the MSD at each node is the trace of its state vector estimation error covariance matrix obtainable in its transient and steady-state formulation from(29)and(30).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The optimal solution to this problem, in the mean square error sense, comes in the form of a centralized Kalman filter implemented at each node [15,29], the operations of which are summarized as: For node i ∈ N : Initialize with:…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…wherex i,n|n−1 andx i,n|n denote the a priori and a posteriori estimates of xi,n, whereas Ci denotes the set of nodes in the same cluster as node i. From [29], if i and l are in the same cluster, we have M i,n|n = M l,n|n . Finally, note that it is assumed a central regulating unit that has prior knowledge of the network clustering structure organizes the distribution of information over the network.…”
Section: Problem Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation