Cost curve of large-scale deployment of CO2-enhanced water recovery technology in modern coal chemical industries in China

Li, Xiaochun; N, Wei; Jiao, Zunsheng; Liu, Shengnan; Dahowski, Robert T.

doi:10.1016/j.ijggc.2018.12.012

Cited by 31 publications

(19 citation statements)

References 35 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…The results show that the matched CO 2 capacity can be 170 Mt/a at costs less than 30 USD/t, and higher capacity can be 3.4 Gt/a at costs less than 70 USD/t (Li et al, 2019). The matched capacity is a tiny portion of theoretical capacity refined by the technical scheme, site suitability, CO 2 source, and economic results.…”

Section: Review On Onshore Aquifer Capacity In Chinamentioning

confidence: 95%

“…The uncertainty effect of capture properties of CO 2 emission sources, geological features, and geographic features can cause the overall cost of CCS projects to deviate highly; potential CCS projects, particularly pipeline networks and integration of various industry sectors, can considerably diverge spatially (Ambrose et al, 2009;Zheng et al, 2009;Middleton et al, 2012b;Dahowski et al, 2012;Welkenhuysen et al, 2013;Bachu, 2016;Sun and Chen, 2017;Edwards and Celia, 2018;Costa et al, 2019;Yu et al, 2019;Guo, 2020). Defining the capacity magnitude and ranges of levelized costs for matched capacity over the set of modeled CO 2 sources and storage reservoirs is the best way to understand the role and potential of CO 2 aquifer storage in background of carbon mitigation and carbon neutrality (Patricio et al, 2017;Costa et al, 2019;Li et al, 2019).…”

Section: Algorithms For Source-sink Matchingmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The site suitability is evaluated by the multiple criteria method (Wei et al, 2013). The matched capacity is improved by the source-sink matching algorithm proposed by Li et al (2019) based on the practical results. This application illustrates that this framework can qualitatively classify the existing capacity assessments into different categories with similar magnitudes but significant discrepancies from storage efficiency.…”

Section: Review On Onshore Aquifer Capacity In Chinamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

A Hierarchical Framework for CO2 Storage Capacity in Deep Saline Aquifer Formations

Jiao

et al. 2022

Front. Earth Sci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Carbon dioxide (CO2) storage in deep saline aquifers is a vital option for CO2 mitigation at a large scale. Determining storage capacity is one of the crucial steps toward large-scale deployment of CO2 storage. Results of capacity assessments tend toward a consensus that sufficient resources are available in saline aquifers in many parts of the world. However, current CO2 capacity assessments involve significant inconsistencies and uncertainties caused by various technical assumptions, storage mechanisms considered, algorithms, and data types and resolutions. Furthermore, other constraint factors (such as techno-economic features, site suitability, risk, regulation, social-economic situation, and policies) significantly affect the storage capacity assessment results. Consequently, a consensus capacity classification system and assessment method should be capable of classifying the capacity type or even more related uncertainties. We present a hierarchical framework of CO2 capacity to define the capacity types based on the various factors, algorithms, and datasets. Finally, a review of onshore CO2 aquifer storage capacity assessments in China is presented as examples to illustrate the feasibility of the proposed hierarchical framework.

show abstract

Section: Review On Onshore Aquifer Capacity In Chinamentioning

confidence: 95%

Section: Algorithms For Source-sink Matchingmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Review On Onshore Aquifer Capacity In Chinamentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Hierarchical Framework for CO2 Storage Capacity in Deep Saline Aquifer Formations

Jiao

et al. 2022

Front. Earth Sci.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The systematical evaluation framework is based on the synthetic framework including evaluation of CO 2 sources, site suitability, and source–sink matching with techno-economic models , and cost curve of potential integrated CCUS projects [2], [3], [4], [5]. The details of this framework can refer to the paper by Li, Wei [1]. The data is generated through this framework considering lots of factors, such as, technology design of full-chain CCUS project, technical features of coal chemical factory, economic parameters, factory location, project size, compression technology, location of storage sites, geological features, injection strategy, reservoir capacity, injectivity of wells, and potential for enhanced resource recovery for each prospective reservoir.…”

Section: Experimental Design Materials and Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Data on potential of CO2 capture and enhanced water recovery projects in modern coal chemical industries in China

Jiao

et al. 2019

Data in Brief

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This data article presents the first systematic assessment on the potential of onshore CO 2 -enhanced water recovery (CO 2 -EWR) using pure CO 2 streams from industrial separation processes by this evaluation framework. The evaluation framework is developed for CO 2 capture, geological utilization and storage (CCUS) project developments, including CO 2 emission inventory, site suitability evaluation, and source–sink matching with techno-economic models. The data shows the matched source (CO 2 source)-sink (onshore aquifer site) pairs with sites distribution and levelized cost under various scenarios. Data also shows the geographic distribution of source-sink pairs, cost curve, annual cumulative CO 2 storage capacity and enhanced water production under various scenarios. Potential large-scale deployments of CO 2 -EWR projects with low cost in the modern coal chemical industry in China are shown and identified in the dataset. This data article is related to the research article “Cost curve of large-scale deployment of CO 2 -enhanced water recovery technology in modern coal chemical industries in China” (X. Li et al. 2019).

show abstract

“…China has abundant coal resources, and the price of coal is lower than that of petroleum. The coal-based route of EG synthesis is becoming popular in recent years . The third is to use biomass as a feedstock to first gasify into syngas and then produce ethylene glycol from the syngas.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Consumption, Pollutant Emission, and Cost Analysis of Coal/Oil/Biomass to Ethylene Glycol

Yang

et al. 2021

ACS Sustainable Chem. Eng.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The industrialized coal-to-ethylene glycol (CtEG) route has become a potential competitor for the conventional oil-to-ethylene glycol (OtEG) route, and the emerging biomass-to-ethylene glycol (BtEG) route is also recognized because of its good environmental performance. In this study, life cycle assessment (LCA) is used to compare and analyze the life cycle energy consumption, pollutant emissions, and life cycle costs (LCC) of CtEG, OtEG, and BtEG routes. According to the results, the ethylene glycol production process is the main contributor to energy consumption and pollutant emissions. Compared with the OtEG route, the BtEG route has lower environmental costs but high direct production costs. The CtEG route provides a viable alternative for coal-rich and oil-deficient countries. However, as a promising production route for ethylene glycol, the CtEG route has the disadvantages of high energy consumption and high pollutant emissions, resulting in large environmental costs and not in line with the concept of sustainable development. Therefore, how to reduce energy consumption and pollutant emissions in the production process, especially carbon emissions, is an urgent problem to be solved. This research provides an important basis for improving the production of ethylene glycol and helps decision makers choose the most suitable production route for ethylene glycol based on actual conditions.

show abstract

Cost curve of large-scale deployment of CO2-enhanced water recovery technology in modern coal chemical industries in China

Cited by 31 publications

References 35 publications

A Hierarchical Framework for CO2 Storage Capacity in Deep Saline Aquifer Formations

A Hierarchical Framework for CO2 Storage Capacity in Deep Saline Aquifer Formations

Data on potential of CO2 capture and enhanced water recovery projects in modern coal chemical industries in China

Comparative Life Cycle Assessment of Energy Consumption, Pollutant Emission, and Cost Analysis of Coal/Oil/Biomass to Ethylene Glycol

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About