2021
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249124
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost–benefit model for multi-generational high-technology products to compare sequential innovation strategy with quality strategy

Abstract: In the rapidly changing high-tech industry, firms that produce multi-generational products struggle to consistently introduce new products that are superior in innovativeness. However, developing innovative products in a short time sequence period is likely to cause quality problems. Therefore, considering time and resource constraints, two kinds of strategies are commonly employed: sequential innovation strategy, sequentially introducing a new generation of technology product at every launch interval, ensurin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Prior research has explored various factors influencing the diffusion process, including forward-looking behavior (Shi, Fernandes, and Chumnumpan 2014), customer satisfaction with prior generations (Bansal, Anand, and Aggrawal 2021), adoption speed (Kapur, Panwar, and Singh 2019;Stremersch, Muller, and Peres 2010), and price and consumer behavior (Tsai 2013). Kim, Jee, and Sohn (2021) examine firms' decision whether to launch multiple generations of products under a regular schedule but with uncertain quality or to launch intermittently but with assured quality. The size and speed of improvements in performance and functionality also vary across generations (Sood and Tellis 2005).…”
Section: Research Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Prior research has explored various factors influencing the diffusion process, including forward-looking behavior (Shi, Fernandes, and Chumnumpan 2014), customer satisfaction with prior generations (Bansal, Anand, and Aggrawal 2021), adoption speed (Kapur, Panwar, and Singh 2019;Stremersch, Muller, and Peres 2010), and price and consumer behavior (Tsai 2013). Kim, Jee, and Sohn (2021) examine firms' decision whether to launch multiple generations of products under a regular schedule but with uncertain quality or to launch intermittently but with assured quality. The size and speed of improvements in performance and functionality also vary across generations (Sood and Tellis 2005).…”
Section: Research Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multigenerational product innovation is defined as the development of multiple generations of new products on the basis of improving the functions or technologies of existing products (Jiang et al , 2022; Chen et al , 2021; Hann et al , 2016), which highlights the improvements or extensions of existing products to innovate successive or subsequent products and emphasizes more on linkage and continuity between two generations of products (Chen et al , 2021; Bornemann et al , 2020). By leveraging the existing knowledge or technology for next-generational products in the multigenerational product innovation process, enterprises can obtain cost benefits, accelerate product innovation, enhance their capabilities to resist risks, satisfy the different needs of customer segments and maintain advantages in the industry evolution process (Kim et al , 2021; Chen et al , 2021; Bornemann et al , 2020).…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Knowledge integration has always been a core component of any new product development process and enables firms to develop core technologies (Tsai et al, 2015;Salunke et al, 2019). Hence, this perspective helps us better understand the multigenerational product innovation process that firms need not only to keep pace with the rapidly changing marketplace but also to accumulate continuous competitive advantages (Bhatia et al, 2020;Kim et al, 2021). We adopted the multi-case study qualitative research method to answer the above-mentioned question because this method has been arguably the most appropriate in exploring "how" questions (Eisenhardt and Graebner, 2007;Gehman et al, 2018;Urbinati et al, 2020).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations