Cost-Benefit Analysis of Adaptation to Beach Loss Due to Climate Change in Japan

Nakajima, Kazunori; Sakamoto, Naoki; Udo, Keiko; Takeda, Youji; Ohno, Eiji; Morisugi, Masafumi; Mori, Ryuta

doi:10.3390/jmse8090715

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 13 publications

(34 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Many of these studies conclude that the introduced planned adaptation measures can mitigate the negative impact of climate change at low cost (Hoffmann, 2019; Robinson et al , 2012; Zeshan and Ko, 2019; Zeshan and Shakeel, 2020) or receive net benefits (Calzadilla et al , 2014; Nakajima et al , 2020; Schenker and Stephan, 2014). Some studies point out that the examined adaptation measures may not be sufficient to solve the problem although helpful (Akune et al , 2015; Arndt et al , 2015; Boyd and Ibarrarán, 2009; Elshennawy et al , 2016; Ouraich et al , 2019; Zidouemba, 2017).…”

Section: Review Findings and Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The examined investments and funding for adaptation include agricultural sector investments (Arndt et al, 2015(Arndt et al, , 2011Bosello et al, 2018;Calzadilla et al, 2013Calzadilla et al, , 2014Elshennawy et al, 2016;Robinson et al, 2012;Zidouemba, 2017), funding of adaptation in developing regions (Ouraich and Tyner, 2018;Schenker and Stephan, 2014), coastal protection investments (Elshennawy et al, 2016;Parrado et al, 2020;Withey et al, 2016), decrease in investments in risky areas (Husby et al, 2016), utilization of insurance and catastrophic bonds (Thirawat et al, 2017), public investments in adaptation (Bachner et al, 2019;Hirte et al, 2018;Hoffmann, 2019;Hoffmann and Stephan, 2018) and adaptation measure of an artificial beach enhancement (Nakajima et al, 2020).…”

Section: How Adaptation Is Addressed In the Computable General Equili...mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Climate change adaptation based on computable general equilibrium models – a systematic review

Wei

Aaheim

2023

IJCCSM

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose This study aims to identify the current state of the art and the gaps in the application of computable general equilibrium (CGE) models on studying climate change adaptation. Design/methodology/approach A systematic review is conducted to select, classify and analyze relevant studies from two databases of Web of Science and Scopus. Findings Totally, 170 articles based on selected keywords were found from both databases, where 56 articles were duplicates. The authors further excluded 17 articles owing to preliminary exclusion criteria. Hence, 97 papers were selected for full-text review and more detailed assessment. Only a few of the studies explicitly have addressed the role of autonomous adaptation embodied in the CGE models. Over one-third of the studies have focused on planned adaptation without explicitly mentioning autonomous adaptation. Agriculture was the most addressed sector, and country-level models are the most adopted. Only one article has focused on South America. Research limitations/implications The review suggests that autonomous adaptation embodied in CGE models was not well addressed in the literature. As the limited studies have shown that autonomous adaptation can dramatically mitigate direct climate change impacts, further studies are needed to examine the importance of the autonomous adaptation for better understanding of climate change impacts. Furthermore, CGE models can provide a joint assessment considering both mitigation and adaptation strategies and management measures as such models have also been widely used to address effects of mitigation measures in the literature. Originality/value The studies on climate change adaptation based on CGE models have been systematically reviewed, and state-of-the-art knowledge and research gaps have been identified.

show abstract