2004
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-540-44449-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost-Benefit Analysis and the Theory of Fuzzy Decisions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The confidence intervals are interpreted as being "low," "medium," and "high" and quantitative measures of these linguistic variables are to be determined based on the characteristics of the project to which the analysis is being applied. The assumption of triangular fuzzy numbers in similar applications can be found in Teodorovic and Vukadinovic (1998) and Dompere (2004).…”
Section: Fuzzy Benefitmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The confidence intervals are interpreted as being "low," "medium," and "high" and quantitative measures of these linguistic variables are to be determined based on the characteristics of the project to which the analysis is being applied. The assumption of triangular fuzzy numbers in similar applications can be found in Teodorovic and Vukadinovic (1998) and Dompere (2004).…”
Section: Fuzzy Benefitmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Thus, the above is a class of multi-benefits attributable to multifactors. Such a case is well described by Dompere (2004). Dompere shows that benefits realized through multifactors can be expressed linearly and are additive.…”
Section: Fuzzy Benefitmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In cost-benefit-type of approaches, data collection usually builds on statistical data collection schemes (Dompere, 2004, Ray, 1990. However with a focus on the analysis of individual actors, data collection needs to build, in addition, on expert knowledge, case studies, and enterprise decision models.…”
Section: Data Collection Schemesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although conventional traffic project evaluation and decision-making methods, such as cost-benefit analysis provides a set of values that are useful to determine the feasibility of a project from a static standpoint, Federal Highway Administration (FHWA) recommends that the full range of reasonable alternatives and their effects need to be considered [1]. Typical methods make fixed value assumptions of non-monetary variables (e.g., travel time, safety and noise) [2], ignore stakeholder variations of alternatives and their attributes [2], disregard information about the probabilistic distribution and uncertainty ranges of evaluation criteria [3], and aggregate certain and uncertain costs and benefits on a common scale [3]. Also there are concerns that they have a myopic focus on only a single stakeholder or a few stakeholders sharing similar interests, e.g., the traffic agency and the motorists.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%