2020
DOI: 10.4230/lipics.icalp.2020.109
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost Automata, Safe Schemes, and Downward Closures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

1
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The domain of a decision function y for a decision pP, X pkq q allowing the player P to choose x pkq P X pkq is the product of V , M , and all the possible previous sets of possible options of the opponent in a round. The range of y is Y , with the restriction that the player P needs to preserve the invariant as in (1).…”
Section: Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The domain of a decision function y for a decision pP, X pkq q allowing the player P to choose x pkq P X pkq is the product of V , M , and all the possible previous sets of possible options of the opponent in a round. The range of y is Y , with the restriction that the player P needs to preserve the invariant as in (1).…”
Section: Gamesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Related works. Over finite words, variants of the pC, Dq-separability problem have been studied for classes C both more general than the regular languages, such as the context free languages [22,49] and higher-order languages [14] (later extended to safe schemes over finite trees [1]), and for classes D more restrictive than the regular languages, such as in [39,40]. The separability and membership problems have also been studied for several classes of infinite-state systems, such as vector addition systems [11,10,23], well-structured transition systems [21], one-counter automata [20], and timed automata [13,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%