1991
DOI: 10.1016/0026-2714(91)90026-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost analysis of a multi-component parallel redundant complex system with overloading effect and waiting under critical human error

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Maillart and Pollock (1999) examined the problem of determining and evaluating optimal fixed-length inspection intervals for a single machine that operates continuously subject to non-obvious random failures. Gupta et al (1991) studied a multi-component parallel system with the overloading effects and waiting time for repair under critical human error. Chung (1987) presented a mathematical model of a repairable parallel system with standby units involving human error and common-cause failure.…”
Section: Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Maillart and Pollock (1999) examined the problem of determining and evaluating optimal fixed-length inspection intervals for a single machine that operates continuously subject to non-obvious random failures. Gupta et al (1991) studied a multi-component parallel system with the overloading effects and waiting time for repair under critical human error. Chung (1987) presented a mathematical model of a repairable parallel system with standby units involving human error and common-cause failure.…”
Section: Miningmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Miscellaneous Agnihotri et al (1992); Anderson et al (1998); Bradley (1995); Carr and Christer (2003); Chung (1987); Dhillon (1986Dhillon ( , 2002; Dhillon and Rayapati (1988a, b); Yang (1993, 1995); Dodson and Nolan (1999); Gramopadhye and Drury (2000); Gupta et al (1991)); Jacob et al (1997); Maillart and Pollock (1999); McRoy (1998); Nakashima et al (1999); Narmada and Jacob (1996); Park and Jung (1996); Ramalhoto (1999); Reason (1990); Salvendy (1986); Sanders and McCormick (1993); Sridharan and Mohanavadivu (1997); Su et al (2000); Sur and Sarkar (1996); Vaurio (1995Vaurio ( , 2001; Wang and Sheu (2003); Yang and Dhillon (1995) performance of inspectors and maintainers. Rankin et al (2000) evaluated the development and implementation of an airline industry process (MEDA) for determining the factors that contribute to maintenance errors and making corrective actions to eliminate the occurrence of similar errors in future.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%