2012
DOI: 10.1016/j.enbuild.2012.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost analysis for optimum thicknesses and environmental impacts of different insulation materials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
56
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 116 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
56
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Bektas Ekici et al [19] used different wall components thicker than those used in this study. Ozel [18] made the model calculations for both heating season model building created by the data taken from the State Institute of Statistics (Prime Ministry, Republic of Turkey). Ucar and Balo [13] determined their results according to sandwich wall with insulation material so that their results are lower than this study.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Model Building Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Bektas Ekici et al [19] used different wall components thicker than those used in this study. Ozel [18] made the model calculations for both heating season model building created by the data taken from the State Institute of Statistics (Prime Ministry, Republic of Turkey). Ucar and Balo [13] determined their results according to sandwich wall with insulation material so that their results are lower than this study.…”
Section: Comparison Of the Model Building Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kaynakli [17] compiled the optimum thickness of the thermal insulation material applied to the buildings and the studies determining its impact on energy consumption. Ozel [18] analyzed a system with a 20-year life and showed that the optimum insulation thickness value varies between 5.4 and 19.2 cm, the energy savings vary between 86.26 and 146.05 US$/m 2 , and the payback period varies between 3.56 and 8.85 years. Bektas Ekici et al [19] calculated the optimum insulation thickness, energy loss, and payback periods for four cities selected from different climatic regions according to the TS 825 (Antalya in the 1st region, Istanbul in the 2nd region, Elazıg in the 3rd region, and Kayseri in the 4th region).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the current approach is inadequate, especially when it considers the cost-optimal methodology [19]. The limited researches about the energetic effect induced by the thermal insulation in summer are the main reason [20,21].…”
Section: S561mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The chosen Mediterranean localities are Palermo, Rome, Milan and Cairo. Increasing internal thermal loads (10,20, 30 W/m 2 ) are considered. The results show that hyper-insulation of buildings is not convenient in the considered climates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors also discussed the balance between embodied and operational energies for different scenarios. Dylewski and Adamczyk [58] investigated the economic and environmental benefits of thermal insulation of external walls and Ozel [59] evaluated the optimum insulation thickness, energy savings and payback period of some envelope solutions using life cycle cost analysis over a lifetime of 20 years of the building. Studies as the one developed by the former authors should be extended to LSF construction to better understand the trade-off between embodied energy and operational energy, and economic and environmental benefits, regarding this type of construction.…”
Section: Strategies For Improving the Thermal Resistance Of Lsf Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%