2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.enconman.2015.07.081
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cost allocation and sensitivity analysis of multi-products from biomass gasification combined cooling heating and power system based on the exergoeconomic methodology

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 56 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It indicates that the overall system efficiency of the TM (22%-24.3%) is less than SM and MM. It is due to the inefficient energy Life cycle of the system (years) 20 42,45,46 Residual value of the gasifier-based system 10% of I c 43,44 Interest rate of the gasifier-based system 10% 43 Number of working days TM, SM, and MM 87, 250, 250 44 Depreciation value of the existing system/year 10% 44 usage of rice husk in the TM boiler system which uses natural draft brick stove of efficiency, 7% to 13%. In TM, the paddy drying process suffers a deprived energy and quality output as it subjects to the varying climatic conditions during open sun drying process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It indicates that the overall system efficiency of the TM (22%-24.3%) is less than SM and MM. It is due to the inefficient energy Life cycle of the system (years) 20 42,45,46 Residual value of the gasifier-based system 10% of I c 43,44 Interest rate of the gasifier-based system 10% 43 Number of working days TM, SM, and MM 87, 250, 250 44 Depreciation value of the existing system/year 10% 44 usage of rice husk in the TM boiler system which uses natural draft brick stove of efficiency, 7% to 13%. In TM, the paddy drying process suffers a deprived energy and quality output as it subjects to the varying climatic conditions during open sun drying process.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The exergoeconomic factor ( f k ) is the ratio of initial investment to operation and maintenance cost, which measures the impact on the system. The value of exergoeconomic factor is proportional to its influence on the system, that is, the greater the ratio, the greater the impact on the system [21]. It is calculated as follows:…”
Section: Exergoeconomic Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most serviceable way to increase the cost effectiveness of the system is to grasp the source of inefficiencies cost, which is very beneficial to reduce the production cost of the system. Some studies were to present a clearer picture of the main irreversibility and their corresponding costs and to find some effective alternatives to improve the efficiency and cost-effectiveness [16][17][18][19][20][21]. The application examples of this kind of multi-effect power plant include the combination of gas turbine cycle and pressurized water reactor power plant, and the combined cycle with co-firing of biomass and natural gas, which can improve the efficiency of the power plant [17,22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Exergoeconomic analysis is the mainstream of biomass based system. Wang and Mao (2015) show that the biomass price greatly influence the product unit cost and the exergy cost of cooling water is the most sensitive among all the demand. However, the comparison of environmental and energy benefits between biomass powered CCHP system and conventional one has not been investigated sufficiently.…”
Section: Renewable Energy Sourcesmentioning
confidence: 99%