2016
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1612.04041
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmology with weak-lensing peak counts

Chieh-An Lin

Abstract: English versionWeak gravitational lensing (WL) causes distortions of galaxy images and probes massive structures on large scales, allowing us to understand the late-time evolution of the Universe. One way to extract the cosmological information from WL is to use peak statistics. Peaks are tracers of massive halos and therefore probe the mass function. They retain non-Gaussian information and have already been shown as a promising tool to constrain cosmology. In this work, we develop a new model to predict WL p… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

1
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 201 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For a more mathematical background of the field, with emphasis on statistical methods see Grimm & Yoo (2018); Munshi et al (2008); Heavens (2009). For a background of specifically the peak statistics see Lin (2016).…”
Section: Weak Gravitational Lensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For a more mathematical background of the field, with emphasis on statistical methods see Grimm & Yoo (2018); Munshi et al (2008); Heavens (2009). For a background of specifically the peak statistics see Lin (2016).…”
Section: Weak Gravitational Lensingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this article we choose to define a peak in κ map by a pixel κ map (x) which is larger than the 8 pixels which surround it (Lin 2016). A point of the peak statistic is computed as follows: A threshold K is taken on κ map , and the peak count (number of peaks which have intensity larger than K) is taken on the sub-set of pixels larger than the threshold.…”
Section: Aggregate Uncertainty In Peak Countsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To cite a few, potential sources of systematics are shape measurement errors (Cardone et al 2014), photometric redshift uncertainty (Cunha et al 2014;Bonnett et al 2016;Choi et al 2016;Gruen & Brimioulle 2017), intrinsic alignment of galaxies (Chisari et al 2014;Codis et al 2015;Schaefer & Merkel 2015;Schrabback et al 2015;Krause et al 2016), baryon physics (Mohammed et al 2014;Harnois-Déraps et al 2015), and instrumental responses (Gurvich & Mandelbaum 2016;Okura et al 2016;Kannawadi et al 2016;Plazas et al 2016). Concerning WL peak counts, studies of systematics have been done by Yang et al (2013) and Osato et al (2015) for baryon physics, Liu, X. et al (2014) for masking, and Liu, J. et al (2014) for magnification bias (see also Lin 2016 for a review of WL-peak-related studies). These existing studies are not sufficient for modeling the peak statistics at high precision.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two algorithms, the Kaiser-Squire and Seitz-Schneider inversions, are considered in this study. We use our stochastic model developed in Paper I, Lin &Kilbinger (2015b, Paper II), andLin et al (2016, Paper III) to examine this effect. The stochasticity of the model makes including different inversions and different mapmaking methods straightforward.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%