2021
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2021.102604
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmology intertwined III: fσ8 and S8

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
66
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 231 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 118 publications
7
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…To be specific, it was shown that NEDE in its simplest form predicts matter to be too clumpy on short scales -quantified by the parameter S 8 . However, this so-called S 8 tension is already present within the ΛCDM model at the 2 to 3σ level [57], and it was found that NEDE is not making it worse. In fact, even when including LSS data, NEDE maintains its strong statistical evidence of 4σ.…”
Section: B Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To be specific, it was shown that NEDE in its simplest form predicts matter to be too clumpy on short scales -quantified by the parameter S 8 . However, this so-called S 8 tension is already present within the ΛCDM model at the 2 to 3σ level [57], and it was found that NEDE is not making it worse. In fact, even when including LSS data, NEDE maintains its strong statistical evidence of 4σ.…”
Section: B Phenomenologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem, also referred to as the σ 8 tension, is with a significance of 2 to 3σ less severe but still gaining attention in the observational community. It tells us that the ΛCDM model predicts too much power in the linear matter power spectrum on small scales [57].…”
Section: Referencesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The following abbreviations are used in this manuscript: We can add to these problems the tensions in the Standard Cosmological Model (ΛCDM), like those of σ 8 and H 0 [19,20]. 3 See the result of a renormalizable stress-energy tensor in Section 6.2 of Ref.…”
Section: Acknowledgmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most statistically significant one is the discrepancy of the Hubble constant extracted from nearby universe probes and that derived from Cosmic Microwave Background (CMB) measurements [12][13][14]. Another one is related to the clustering parameter σ 8 , whose values differ for CMB and weak lensing estimates [15]. The third one, the so-called lensing anomaly [7,16], is the focus of this work.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%