1991
DOI: 10.1063/1.4822978
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmological N-Body Simulations

Abstract: In this review we discuss Cosmological N-Body codes with a special emphasis on Particle Mesh codes. We present the mathematical model for each component of N-Body codes. We compare alternative methods for computing each quantity by calculating errors for each of the components. We suggest an optimum set of components that can be combined reduce overall errors in N-Body codes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
176
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 172 publications
(178 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
176
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A large number of groups have therefore developed N-body codes for collisionless dynamics that compute the large-scale gravitational field by means of Fourier techniques. These are the PM, P 3 M, and AP 3 M codes (Eastwood & Hockney 1974;Hohl 1978;Hockney & Eastwood 1981;Efstathiou et al 1985;Couchman 1991;Bertschinger & Gelb 1991;MacFarland et al 1998). Modern versions of these codes supplement the force computation on scales below the mesh size with a direct summation, and/or they place mesh refinements on highly clustered regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large number of groups have therefore developed N-body codes for collisionless dynamics that compute the large-scale gravitational field by means of Fourier techniques. These are the PM, P 3 M, and AP 3 M codes (Eastwood & Hockney 1974;Hohl 1978;Hockney & Eastwood 1981;Efstathiou et al 1985;Couchman 1991;Bertschinger & Gelb 1991;MacFarland et al 1998). Modern versions of these codes supplement the force computation on scales below the mesh size with a direct summation, and/or they place mesh refinements on highly clustered regions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Abell clusters were selected using galaxies in a sphere of a radius of about 1.5 h −1 Mpc. Our density field method to find halos is rather similar to the DENMAX method by Bertschinger & Gelb (1991) and Gelb & Bertschinger (1994). The basic difference lies in the detail: we do not use particles to define the center and the mass of the halo, but only data obtained directly from the density field.…”
Section: Comparison Of Halo Findersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely used halo-finding algorithm called the friends-of-friends algorithm (e.g., Davis et al 1985) and the spherical overdensity algorithm (Cole & Lacey 1994, Navarro, Frenk, & White 1996 are not acceptable (Bertschinger & Gelb 1991), because they cannot separate substructures within large halos.…”
Section: Halo Identificationmentioning
confidence: 99%