2021
DOI: 10.3390/universe7030057
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmological Constraints on the Coupling Model from Observational Hubble Parameter and Baryon Acoustic Oscillation Measurements

Abstract: In the paper, we consider two models in which dark energy is coupled with either dust matter or dark matter, and discuss the conditions that allow more time for structure formation to take place at high redshifts. These models are expected to have a larger age of the universe than that of ΛCDM [universe consists of cold dark matter (CDM) and dark energy (a cosmological constant, Λ)], so it can explain the formation of high redshift gravitationally bound systems which the ΛCDM model cannot interpret. We use the… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
(52 reference statements)
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Finally we match our theory with observational Hubble data (OHD) obtained from two additional cosmic probe methods, the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and the cosmic chronometer, coupled across the redshift range of z = [0 − 2.4] in 40 redshift bins. We derived the OHD data from [47], who constructed it from various BAO and cosmic chronometer observational data mentioned therein [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. As it can be seen our model at its best fit b value gives a very agreement to the observational data collected from the BAO and the cosmic chronometers together as shown in fig.…”
Section: B Observational Hubble Datasupporting
confidence: 57%
“…Finally we match our theory with observational Hubble data (OHD) obtained from two additional cosmic probe methods, the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and the cosmic chronometer, coupled across the redshift range of z = [0 − 2.4] in 40 redshift bins. We derived the OHD data from [47], who constructed it from various BAO and cosmic chronometer observational data mentioned therein [48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61]. As it can be seen our model at its best fit b value gives a very agreement to the observational data collected from the BAO and the cosmic chronometers together as shown in fig.…”
Section: B Observational Hubble Datasupporting
confidence: 57%
“…The error bar in Figs.26 and 27represent the observational Hubble parameter data[46,96]. In the right panel of Fig.26, the evolution curve of H for BHDEF model was plotted with = 0.1.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Finally, we match our theory with observational Hubble data (OHD) obtained from two additional cosmic probe methods, the baryon acoustic oscillation (BAO) and the cosmic chronometer, coupled across the redshift range of z = [0-2.4] in 40 redshift bins. We derived the OHD data from [59], who constructed it from various BAO and cosmic chronometer observational data mentioned therein [58,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71]. Our model, at its best fit 'b' value, provides agreement to the observational data collected from the BAO and the cosmic chronometers together as shown in Figure 6 across almost the entire redshift range.…”
Section: Observational Hubble Datamentioning
confidence: 52%