2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.astropartphys.2016.08.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmogenic activation of materials used in rare event search experiments

Abstract: We evaluate the cosmogenic production rates in some materials that are commonly used as targets and shielding/supporting components for detecting rare events. The results from Geant4 simulations and the calculations of ACTIVIA are compared with the available experimental data. We demonstrate that the production rates from the Geant4-based simulations agree with the available data reasonably well. As a result, we report that the cosmogenic production of several isotopes in various materials can generate potenti… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
108
2

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 58 publications
(115 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
(95 reference statements)
5
108
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The Geant4 package (V9.5p02 + Shielding physics list) used for this study is the same as the one used in our previous study [11]. We simulate two detector geometries in this work.…”
Section: Geant4 Monte Carlo Simulation Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The Geant4 package (V9.5p02 + Shielding physics list) used for this study is the same as the one used in our previous study [11]. We simulate two detector geometries in this work.…”
Section: Geant4 Monte Carlo Simulation Set-upmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, for the production of the other two critical isotopes, 65 Zn and 68 Ge, the difference between ACTIVIA and the EDELWEISS data is a factor of more than 2 depending on the neutron flux used in ACTIVIA. For example, for the production of 68 Ge, the difference between ACTIVIA1 and the EDELWEISS data is at least a factor of 7.2 and the difference between ACTIVIA2 and the EDELWEISS data is at least a factor of 3 since ACTIVIA2 used a more accurate neutron spectrum based on the fit to the data [11].…”
Section: Comparison Between This Work and Previous Estimates And Measmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is significant since radioactive isotopes can be produced by neutron-induced spallation reactions whilst the material is still above ground. Stainless steel contains isotopes of iron, nickel and chromium that can be activated to form radioisotopes such as 56 Co, 58 Co, 54 Mn and 48 V [5], whilst in titanium, only the production of 46 Sc is a concern [6]. Although the LUX experiment [7][8][9][10], LZ's most recent predecessor, successfully manufactured and deployed a cryostat constructed from low-activity titanium to contain 350 kg of LXe [11], securing similarly radiopure material has proved non-trivial across the field of rare-event search experiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%