2019
DOI: 10.1002/aic.16787
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

COSMO‐UNIFAC model for ionic liquids

Abstract: The united chemical thermodynamic model, that is, COSMO-UNIFAC model was first extended to the systems containing ionic liquids (ILs). This model for ILs combines the respective advantages of COSMO-based (priori prediction) and UNIFAC (relatively accurate prediction) models. The comparison of the predicted values by COSMO-UNIFAC model with experimental data indicates that this model can provide a moderate quantitative prediction for the systems containing ILs when the UNIFAC model parameters are vacant.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
31
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
5
31
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Second, the solute type specific comparison is also made between the RS model predictions with the UNIFAC‐IL calculations, where the lower MAPE of the RS model is generally observed with only an exception for the carboxylic acids. This finding also holds true when comparing the RS model with the UNIFAC and COSMO‐UNIFAC models reported by Dong et al, 21 although only a small number of experimental data are available for the mutual comparison (see detailed data and statistics in Table S3). To summarize, the developed RS model quantitatively outperforms the state‐of‐the‐art methods for predicting solute‐in‐IL γ ∞ .…”
Section: Dnn‐based Rs For γ∞ Predictionsupporting
confidence: 72%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Second, the solute type specific comparison is also made between the RS model predictions with the UNIFAC‐IL calculations, where the lower MAPE of the RS model is generally observed with only an exception for the carboxylic acids. This finding also holds true when comparing the RS model with the UNIFAC and COSMO‐UNIFAC models reported by Dong et al, 21 although only a small number of experimental data are available for the mutual comparison (see detailed data and statistics in Table S3). To summarize, the developed RS model quantitatively outperforms the state‐of‐the‐art methods for predicting solute‐in‐IL γ ∞ .…”
Section: Dnn‐based Rs For γ∞ Predictionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…It can be seen that all the binary interaction parameters involved in the IL‐solute group matrix are filled in the UNIFAC‐IL extension thanks to the advantage of the RS established above. Again, the obtained UNIFAC‐IL model is compared with the UNIFAC and COSMO‐UNIFAC reported by Dong et al 21 As tabulated in Table S7, for the seven involved binary systems with overall 412 data points (Acetonitrile + [BMIM][BF 4 ], Pyridine + [EMIM][SCN], Acetone + [EMIM][CF 3 SO 3 ], Thiophene + [BMIM][PF 6 ], Methanol + [EMIM][DEP], Acetone + [EMIM][DEP], Ethanol + [EMIM][DEP]), the MAPEs between experimental γ and predictions by different methods follows the ranking of: COSMO‐UNIFAC (21.50%) > UNIFAC‐IL (16.79%) ≈ UNIFAC (16.54%). The UNIFAC model by Dong et al presents the lowest MAPE here as this model is essentially regressed from these VLE data.…”
Section: Application Of Rsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 3 more Smart Citations