2008
DOI: 10.1086/528674
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic Variance and Its Effect on the Luminosity Function Determination in Deep High‐zSurveys

Abstract: We study cosmic variance in deep high-redshift surveys and its influence on the determination of the luminosity function for high-redshift galaxies. For several survey geometries relevant for Hubble Space Telescope (HST ) and James Webb Space Telescope (JWST ) instruments, we characterize the distribution of the galaxy number counts. This is obtained by means of analytic estimates via the two-point correlation function in extended Press-Schechter theory, as well as by using synthetic catalogs extracted from N-… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

26
357
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 363 publications
(384 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
(94 reference statements)
26
357
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of a cluster field, we computed the effective volume covered by this survey in a similar manner as in Coe et al (2015) and using a mask of the bright objects in the cluster core. -Error bars include statistical uncertainties and cosmic variance computed using the integration of a two-point correlation function over the volume explored by our survey (Trenti & Stiavelli 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of a cluster field, we computed the effective volume covered by this survey in a similar manner as in Coe et al (2015) and using a mask of the bright objects in the cluster core. -Error bars include statistical uncertainties and cosmic variance computed using the integration of a two-point correlation function over the volume explored by our survey (Trenti & Stiavelli 2008).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Our analysis, in which we assign the same distance modulus to all galaxies with z phot < 0.3 complicates an estimate of this cosmic variance, since the basic recipes by e.g. Trenti & Stiavelli (2008), Moster et al (2011) cannot be applied. We do however make an empirical estimate based on catalogues from the 4 spatially independent CFHT Legacy Survey Deep fields Hildebrandt et al 2009), which each cover an un-masked area of about 0.8 deg 2 .…”
Section: Statistical Background Subtractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various models to account for the effects of cosmic variance exist in the literature. Trenti & Stiavelli (2008) have developed a model that is offered as an on-line calculator. From this model and assuming a one-to-one correspondence between dark halos and LAEs, we obtain a value of ∼28% for the cosmic variance.…”
Section: Variancementioning
confidence: 99%