2022
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361/202243710
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cosmic star formation history with tomographic cosmic infrared background-galaxy cross-correlation

Abstract: In this work we present a new method for probing the star formation history of the Universe, namely tomographic cross-correlation between the cosmic infrared background (CIB) and galaxy samples. The galaxy samples are from the Kilo-Degree Survey (KiDS), while the CIB maps are made from Planck sky maps at 353, 545, and 857 GHz. We measure the cross-correlation in harmonic space within 100 < ℓ < 2000 with a significance of 43σ. We model the cross-correlation with a halo model, which links CIB anisotropies to sta… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

5
23
1

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 130 publications
5
23
1
Order By: Relevance
“…due to photo-z outliers or a steeper-than-expected b(z) relation), we perform one further check to test the robustness of the low σ 8 value measured for that sample. We made use of the clustering redshifts technique, as implemented in Tomographer, 12 to measure the product b(z)p(z) up to an unknown normalization factor. Tomographer uses a spectroscopic reference sample from SDSS comprising JCAP11(2023)043 and prediction from our best-fit model.…”
Section: Redshift Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…due to photo-z outliers or a steeper-than-expected b(z) relation), we perform one further check to test the robustness of the low σ 8 value measured for that sample. We made use of the clustering redshifts technique, as implemented in Tomographer, 12 to measure the product b(z)p(z) up to an unknown normalization factor. Tomographer uses a spectroscopic reference sample from SDSS comprising JCAP11(2023)043 and prediction from our best-fit model.…”
Section: Redshift Uncertaintiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same technique can be applied to any projected tracer of the large-scale structure other than weak lensing, and can be used to e.g. measure the evolution in the mean gas pressure [8][9][10][11][12] and star-formation density [13,14], or to reconstruct the redshift distribution of different probes [15,16].…”
Section: Jcap11(2023)043 1 Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• the dust SED that describes the frequency dependence: [17,22,27,28] assumed a graybody SED and fit the dust temperature and spectral indices; [23][24][25]29] introduced SED obtained from multi-wavelength measurements [10,11];…”
Section: Jcap05(2024)058mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…• the SFR that determines the redshift dependence: [22,29,30] assumes empirical models for SFR density (SFRD); [27] assumed a lognormal dependence of SFR on halo mass in the context of the halo model [31,32] and a power-law dependence on 1+z; [23] proposed a model connecting SFR with baryon accretion rate which is given by simulations and a slightly more complicated SFR − M connection. This model is also used in [24][25][26].…”
Section: Jcap05(2024)058mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation